Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

1 comment |  Print | E-Mail Top Press Commentary  


A Four-State Solution Is Needed In Israel-Palestine

Jonathan Freedland, The Guardian | December 18, 2008

To settle the Israel-Palestine conflict, a four-state solution should be considered. ++ Israel would be surrounded by the West Bank, ruled by secular nationalists Fatah, and Gaza, ruled by Islamist Hamas. ++ With regard to the current events, a third state called “Judea” might be considered. ++ The Arab world must support Palestine in order to give Israelis incentives to negotiate. ++ The Arab League has urged Obama to work for peace, giving him the chance to prove that the US can still impose its will on the area.

 

 
 
Comments
Lior  Petek

Sun, Dec 28th 2008, 17:32

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
At first sight, the four-state solution strikes me as a quite pragmatic and innovative approach. On closer examination, however, it suffers from similar shortcomings the two-state solution suffers from, that is, it does not address, for instance, the crucial question of guaranteeing Israel's security. Accordingly, it is difficult to image that Israel would agree to the creation of a Hamas state bordering on it.

On the other hand, I agree with the assessment made in the article that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is actually an Arab-Israeli one, which becomes clear when one looks at all the Arab states that do not recognize Israel’s right to exist and went to war with Israel. Therefore, just focusing on the Palestinian dimension of the conflict is dangerous.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Arjun Johannes Menon
Arjun Johannes Menon
Member since
November 16, 2009

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?