Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

December 16, 2008 |  22 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Editorial Team

What Strategy to Tackle Somali Piracy? Vote Here

Editorial Team: The escalation of pirate attacks off the coast of Somalia has brought about widespread discussion as to how to deal with this increasingly prevalent problem. We are inviting you to tell us what you think is the most viable way forward through our interactive poll.

 Far from being consigned to adventure books and Hollywood blockbusters, piracy is a thriving phenomenon off the coast of Somalia. The lawlessness of the country has allowed fishermen to repeatedly hijack commercial ships and claim million dollar ransoms in the Gulf of Aden. The most recent attack saw the capture of Sirius Star, a Saudi vessel carrying 2 million barrels of crude oil, and prompted a $25 million ransom. In an area of vast seas off the coast of a lawless state, piracy activities are low risk and give high returns.

The piracy problem undoubtedly needs an across-the-board solution which incorporates economic and geo-political initiatives from both Somalia and the international community. But what should the priorities be? We want to know what strategies you think should take precedence. Here is a list of possible courses of action.

A. ACTION AT SEA

1. Increase EU Naval Patrols

The countries of the world that possess quality navies should maintain a constant presence along the coast and increase the number of patrolling warships. Naval anti-pirate patrols with the capacity to use force are needed. The EU recently began anti-piracy “Operation Atalanta” along these lines, with a mandate for “deterrence, prevention and intervention.” Provisions for arrest and detention of pirates in EU countries should be expanded and clarified.

2. Action from NATO

An aggressive military NATO initiative would reap better results than a maiden EU naval operation. NATO has the experience and capacity to better deal with the logistical difficulties of the huge area involved, as well as a clearer mandate to use military means. Decoy vessels that look like normal transport vehicles, loaded with explosives and specialist armed crews and escape boats could patrol the waters

3. Arm Merchant Ships

Merchant ships should be armed with weapons. This would be preferable to relying on a centralized naval patrol. Private contractors with expertise in the field could be hired on-board to provide security. Increasing ship speeds would also allow ships to outrun pirates, thus giving them the capacity to defend themselves from hijack attacks.

4. Clarify Legal Issues

The international community needs to address the legal difficulties which surround high seas piracy before naval patrols or military activity can be effective. The current UN mandate does not give the international fleet permission to seize hijacked ships in order to free hostages. The UN must begin by clarifying the legal position of anti-piracy operations; then more aggressive action can be taken to better effect.

B. ACTION ON LAND

5. Recognize Somali Breakaway States

The warlords who enable this banditry need to be tackled. The most effectual means of doing this would be to recognize the quasi-states of Puntland and Somaliland where the majority of pirates hail from. Recognition from the international community would strengthen the government institutions here. In exchange, the warlords of these states would have to actively root out pirates in their territory.

6. Pursue Pirates On Land

Concerted and aggressive efforts from the international community to locate and punish pirate networks on land are needed. The chaotic state of Somali poses significant barriers to gaining accurate intelligence; efforts should be made to overcome these, involving cooperation with local factions if necessary. An aggressive approach on land would tackle the low-risk nature of Somali piracy and act as both a deterrent and a remedy.

7. Bring in the United Nations

UN peacekeeping troops should be deployed in Somalia. The country should be rebuilt as a provisional UN protectorate to eliminate the causes of and opportunities for piracy. The African Union Commission chief Jean Ping has urged UN peace forces to intervene. Ground troops would provide a bolster to the sanctions the UN has imposed aimed at reducing arms flow into the country. Somalia must become a functional state again before there can be any end in site for piracy.

8. Address Pirates' Grievances

Many pirates insist that they are in fact providing a civilian "coast guard" service for their countrymen by deterring illegal fishing in their waters. Since the government’s collapse in 1991, foreign fishing vessels have been plundering the tuna-rich Somali waters. The pirates, many of whom are themselves fishermen, are in need of alternative employment. The international community could acknowledge their grievances and employ their services in the next Johnny Depp movie.


Please choose up to two measures which you think should be the priority. Should you have other suggestions not covered in the poll, please discuss them below.

Prepared and written by Eimear O'Casey

 

 

 

 

  • 13
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | pirates | Somalia | poll | merchant fleet | NATO | EU | Atalanta |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

December 17, 2008

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
This would be an excellent example of multilateralism which could help heal some of the problems caused by Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S., the EU or NATO, along with responsible up and coming nations like India, China, Pakistan, Russia, and others could coordinate truly multilateral actions. All of the major countries have a stake in keeping the shipping lanes open. Building African civil society, maybe through the AU would help over the long run.
 
Michael  Schuster

December 17, 2008

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I am in favor of armed merchant ships, because piracy is the price that private companies have to pay for globalization.

International trade is now quite cheap and makes globalization possible. So surely these shipping countries have enough money to hire private contractors and arm themselves.

Re the other options:
The EU should rather deal with economic problems in Europe.

And since NATO can't do everything. it should focus on Afghanistan. Otherwise they will fail at two missions: Afghanistan and Piracy.

The UN screwed up in Somalia before, so let's not try that again. Please
 
Unregistered User

December 17, 2008

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Merchant ships should be armed with weapons. This would be preferable to relying on a centralized naval patrol. Private contractors with expertise in the field could be hired on-board to provide security. Increasing ship speeds would also allow ships to outrun pirates, thus giving them the capacity to defend themselves from hijack attacks."

this eventuality has already been forecasted by ships Cies, they finally decided that it'll cost them much more money than that changing their navigation path, they prefer to conturn Africa by the Cap

Nato OK, better than the UN, see how UN deals Congo, 17000 UN soldiers, only 800 serve

Pursue pirats on the ground, OK, actually that was lately voted by the Security concil, France didn't wait for the green light, while she rescued the Ponant hostages she hunted the pirats on ground and catched them with up to 3/5 of the ransum

Also the problem there isn't only piracy, but AQ destabilisation of a poor country.
So if the Aden gulf is a primordial channel for shipping merchandises, then we ought to not ignore who are making trouble in the nearby countries, and may-be think how to control them either, help them to reconstruct their identity and governance
 
Unregistered User

December 18, 2008

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
If there were one sure-fire solution to this problem, then it would have been dealt with long ago and not be a topic for this forum. I think arming merchant ships AND dealing with the pirates greivances would provide a viable solution.

It would provide the needed security for merchants both immediately from all pirates and long term from pure criminals. Combined with this, the addressing of fisherman's concerns about international theft in Somali fisheries would settle the concern if it is valid and remove it as an excuse for criminals.

Patrols in the area by NATO, Russia, India and China would prevent large scale piracy and provide some means of deterrence. At the same time it would provide an avenue for dialogue between the naval institutions of the major world economies, which is much needed.

The onboard security for the merchants would consist of private contractors hired either at the port immediately before transitting the region and retained until destination, or could be acquired for a smaller trip. Most of the pirates are poorly armed bands in high speed rigids taking ships by surprise and shock. Most moderately trained force protection contractors could provide adequate security against such threats. The cost could be folded into insurance, or seen as a temproary necessity. I think it is important with this avenue that the merchants remain merchants and the line between security forces and merchant marines remain distinct. Theoretically the Somali pirate threat is temporary, whereas a blurring of the line between merchant and military and the setting of the precedent of deck guns on freighters is permanent.
 
Unregistered User

December 18, 2008

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
8. Address Pirates' Grievances
omg - what a radical idea to actually tackle the problems plaguing Somalia and the horn of Africa!

I mean, come on! If the international community spent the time and resources addressing the serious needs of Somalia in the first place instead taking advantage of civil war and chaos in order to plunderi their tuna rich shores, there wouldn't be piracy.

Ach, who am I kidding? We (the people of the developed countries) have grocery stores to fill and profits to make. Anyway, a world with pirates is much more interesting to me.
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 18, 2008

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Tobin, I am afraid that you don't know the whole history of the people there, there have been pirats along the centuries, Rimbaud in Abyssinie, Henri de Monfreid's books related of the piracy there,end of 19th century, 1rst half of 20th century, also see if one can find some sources in the Ottoman archives ; the fact is that Somalia, Djibuti, Yemen have been poor states for so long, some reg (stones desert ) made piracy worth for many persons !

Plus Somalians have always had the reputation of being bellicose
 
Donald  Stadler

December 18, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Ach, who am I kidding? We (the people of the developed countries) have grocery stores to fill and profits to make. Anyway, a world with pirates is much more interesting to me."

So, are the pirates seizing fishing boats poaching in ther waters to highlight their greivances, or are they going after 'high-value' targets and seeking ransom?

The latter, I believe. I could understand forcing fishing trawlers into port, or cutting their trawling nets, measures like that would make sense. What doesn't make sense is to grab oil tankers and demand ransom if all you are trying to do is protect fishing grounds.

But they are not doing that, of course. They are taking advantage of anarchy to pirate ships off their coastline to make as much money as possible. It's far more accurate to view them as pirates than as poor misunderstood fishermen as Tobin advocates.

One more thing; how likely is it that the 'developed world' is actually taking their catch? Meaning, Europe, the US, Russia, China, Japan? Not likely. It's most likely fishermen from a nation bordering the Indian Ocean or one of the gulfs depending on it. It might be worthwhile to find out who is doing it and ask them to take measures - or perhaps the antipiracy vessels being deployed may be able to do this. But that is far as I'll go.
 
Unregistered User

December 19, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Yehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Give us some weapons! My watch would be much more exiting when I could do some shooting drills from the bridge wing when there is not so much traffic.

I would prefer to be equipped with German MG3 's and also some ship to ship missiles would be great to. So I could blow those Chinese fishing boats out of the water when entering Shanghai. These fuckers are driving me nuts!

So....WEAPONS FOR SAILORS!!!!!!!!!!!!! YAY;YAY;YAY!!!!!
 
Unregistered User

December 19, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Detox, Kug Mal auf, the Chineses are joining the Armada,

so, "Touché"

"Coulé"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,469205,00.html
 
Donald  Stadler

December 19, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Excellent idea, Detox. Blow a few chinese fishermen out of this mortal coil whilst inside Chinese territorial waters is bound to make your life more interesting instantly.

Particularly when you realize that China still has the death penalty.
 
Unregistered User

December 19, 2008

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Marie-Claude Corneauster, I think you are biased.
I am well aware of the history of pirates. In fact, I am quite fond of the Barbary tradition.

But to claim Somalis are bellicose - they are no more bellicose than the developed world is hogwash.
We just do our pillaging and plundering differently. We have just adjusted to nationalist aggression into economic suppression....
 
Unregistered User

December 19, 2008

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Donald, it's far more accurate to view them as poor misunderstood people than as pirates but that is not acceptable to the corporations and governments losing inventory off the horn of Africa - And certainly, the mainstream media who serve those corporations and governments are not going to report otherwise.

Also, these "abducted" seamen - let's face it, if your job consisted of delivering freight around the world wouldn't being seized by pirates make life all that more interesting? Hell, it sure beats a cubical.
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 19, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

"I mean, come on! If the international community spent the time and resources addressing the serious needs of Somalia in the first place instead taking advantage of civil war and chaos in order to plunderi their tuna rich shores, there wouldn't be piracy.

Ach, who am I kidding? We (the people of the developed countries) have grocery stores to fill and profits to make. Anyway, a world with pirates is much more interesting to me"

OK, some alter-mondialist remorses. there ? see Don told you that the somali pirats hijack the humanitarian grocery ships, um, do they that for the good sake of their poor compatriots ? So far no, they sell the goods either


"I am well aware of the history of pirates. In fact, I am quite fond of the Barbary tradition."

OK,, I don't contest that you read Mother Goose piraty tales, neither that you had dreamt of being an invincible pirat, I did too, though my advantage upon you on that purpose is that I know that Djibouti was a french department until 1977, and that still a cooperation military agreement is on with France, that has there Légion Etrangère camps, also shared with the US Marine Corps that are training there together.

Plus the 2nd husband of my mother in law was a Djiboutian, and that he had some stories about the somalian raids into Djibouti territory.

"But to claim Somalis are bellicose - they are no more bellicose than the developed world is hogwash. "

http://www.denden.com/Conflict/newscom/ethiopian_myth.html

Bizarre, that the former "socialist" empire had something to gain with this poor reg country, um and that former eastern Germans were implicated in the bellicosery of these gentle , nonentheless, anarchist guerilla fighters, oops inoffensive pirats !!!!

We just do our pillaging and plundering differently. We have just adjusted to nationalist aggression into economic suppression....

Yes, say, a difference of perspective , and I agree with your non-biased empathy, I recommand you to enrol for an humanitarian trip there !
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 19, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
tobin, get an idea how this is not your tin-foiled good consciencenes that is going on there, some fellows would argue that the "horn" is a key zone for controlling the world merchandises shippings, he the nicest of them think your a valuable infidel that must be ransomed or beheaded

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dangerous-seas-when-pirates-become-isl...
 
Bernhard  Lucke

December 19, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
any military solution will be quite costly and may end with a factual partial occupation of Somalia, with all the same trouble which we are now facing in other occupied countries

I think the whole issue follows a simple cost-benefit analysis of all involved parties: is it worth for the pirates to take the risk of attacking ships, and is it worth for the developed countries to undertake escorts, or reprisal raids on coastal villages?

In my opinion, the military logic is only viable for short-term proposals; on the long run, it will never pay off. If ships are armed, or if villages are raided by NATO troops, the pirates will adapt their tactics. More importantly, violence will breed more violence, survival myths, revenge, and ultimately bolsters terrorism. I assume the pirates have nothing to lose, but much to gain. There is a risk to breed a long-term terrorism problem in Africa.

So, I assume the only path to long-term success is restoring law and order in Somalia: by a U.N. mission, negotiations with breakaway states, and by creation of business opportunities for the fishermen.

This does not mean that one should end the naval patrols. But like in Afghanistan and Iraq, we are witnessing how the military alone is not able to solve the problem at reasonable costs - as long we don't turn to the genocide-type of missions like during WW II, which might be highly effective, but are opposed our moral values. Not to speak of the guilt and hatred they might create.
 
Donald  Stadler

December 19, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Tell you what Tobin. I don't really see this as a problem for the US at all. I think the US should leave these poor misunderstood fishermen toting AK-47's entirely in the expert hands of Germany to succor.

With aid and sufficient resources poured into the area I think one of two things may happen. If the 'pirates' really are misunderstood pacifists things will quiet down. If they are not, one suspects that larger, more seaworthy vesels with better armaments may appear off the Somali coast. Which would be sad, of course. But the Somali coast is a long way from the US, and very little traffic critical to the US passes that way.
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 20, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Don, seems that your administration read you

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,470344,00.html

um, isn't China taking the relay ? of the mighty 21th century power ?

the article doesn't say that Germany is part of the Armada, can anyone confirm ?
 
Donald  Stadler

December 20, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Marie-Claude, you're baiting again.

Perhaps China is 'taking the lead' - except that one suspects with after the Chinese ships arrive the US will still have many times the committment that China does.

But the Chinese arrival will be welcome nevertheless, because I suspect that Chinese law is not as weak in the face of pirates as the law of the EU countries, which may actually demand that the pirates be rewarded for their crimes, not punished.

As for Germany being part of the 'armada' - I have two thoughts.

1) Germany as a rule confines itself to making high policy, being far too sensitive and fine to get down into the mud (or in this case the scuppers) with the rest of us (France, US, UK, and other such fascist swine). Germany commands, others obey, you understand?

2) If Germany did send ships to the Somali coast would they actually be able to do anything about the pirates? Legally they would be obliged to bring the pirates to Germany for a trial, and given German rules of evidence a conviction would be impossible, so the German government would probably be obliged to pay the poor pirates for the insult of putting them on trial.

Moreover, German forces in the area would probably also be legally obliged to prevent any efforts to punish the pirates more severely than provided for under German law (i.e. reward them). So perhaps it's better they don't come, because they might be forced to fire on their allies to prevent 'war-crimes' being committed....
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 20, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Don, it's a pleasure, your such a good fellow :lol:

though you will be appreciated for what your saying, I am not so pervert !!!!
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

December 21, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Papy Bush wanted to make a paradise, but had no means, anyway, it's funny to see that weird countries want to participate to the ships festival, the Iranians too

It's obvious that the is not a viable and durable solution, something has to be decided about the RE-construction of this no-man-land

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4fq-7G0Z-9La1naA...
 
Bernhard  Lucke

December 28, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
to those who believe so much in military solutions of piracy, let me cite a famous historical example: the pirates of the Mediterranean who captured Gaius Iulius Caesar among many other prominent people around 50 BC. They were a real terror and the Mediterranean a very unsafe place

Caesar paid a ransom double the amount the pirates had demanded, then armed a fleet, returned, killed the pirates, and got his ransom back

however his reprisal raid did not stop piracy or mitigated the problem by any means

the one who solved the problem was Caesar's rival Pompey: certainly his success would not have been possible without his strong fleet and use of force, but what made it an ultimate success, and ended piracy once and for all, was that he settled the surviving pirates in depopulated cities.

Instead of just slaughtering them, he treated them as fellow humans and gave them a perspective for an existence after the time of the piracy. This aspect is in my opinion often overlooked in the history of the Roman empire. Without their ability to integrate their conquered peoples, they would never have succeeded so long.

Please do not confuse weakness with humanity. This all-too-manly talking of "strength", seeing the solution in the use of force alone, is in fact a sign of inner weakness and lack of compassion.

what's the meaning of the funny talking about Germany? If you think the Germans hinder the hunt for terrorists and pirates, why don't you just go ahead and hunt them as you did, but please shoulder the consequences yourself then. If you ask the Germans to help, please remember that we bring a complex legacy connected with an unlimited use of and belief in force

there's no doubt that the Nazi forces were very efficient, but the moral and emotional price, and the guilt, were too high. Yet I understand that some children only learn their lesson if they burn themselves in the fire; it doesn't help them to see how others were burned
 
Donald  Stadler

December 28, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Actually, Herr, Lucke, I bvelieve that Gnaius Pompey actually did both. He began with a roundup, sweeping them into a slaughter, then resettled the survivors once he had caught their attention so to speak. Pompey's nickname among Romans was 'Kid Butcher', and he earned it. This was not a man chary of spilling blood when conditions demanded it.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Jean-Paul  Gagnon
Jean-Paul Gagnon
Member since
May 16, 2011

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?