Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

August 13, 2007 |  2 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Will Kosovo End the Transatlantic Honeymoon?

Nikolas Kirrill Gvosdev: The US course of action on statehood for Kosovo will be a major test for the newly fortified transatlantic relationship.

Many Americans—especially the 2008 presidential candidates—continue to misinterpret Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy. Both are pro-American, but from a European perspective. And it is clear that their overwhelming priority remains to reinvigorate the Franco-German partnership that is at the heart of the EU.
Take the matter of Kosovo. Washington has continued to believe that in the absence of a UN Security Council resolution delineating final status for the province, the United States could move ahead with its plans to recognize an independent state. Former chief of staff for President Clinton John Podesta stated the Washington consensus when he declared last month, in advance of the visit of Vuk Jeremic, the Serbian Foreign Minister, to Washington: “It is clear that after those talks conclude, the United States is prepared to recognize an independent Kosovo.

Most here believe that, as fellow democracies, the European countries would accept this outcome—especially since the common EU position is to use the plan presented by Marti Ahtisaari as the basis for any final settlement. Indeed, the United States is completely dependent on the EU taking responsibility for the transition, especially in terms of providing security and proffering economic assistance, since Washington remains distracted by its involvement in Iraq.

The EU, of course, came to its common position—endorsing eventual independence for Kosovo coupled with a UN Security Council resolution—because member states of the Union have understandable fears about possible precedents. Most Europeans recognize, if many Americans do not, that no “imposed solution” is going to last unless, in the final run, both Serbia and the Kosovars are prepared to implement it.

And a compromise solution is possible—but the problem is that it would require the United States to have to modify its own position about its preferences for Kosovo (as well as the desire of a number of 2008 presidential candidates to use a “success” in Kosovo as part of their own campaign pitch, notably for Senators John McCain and Hillary Clinton).

But I cannot fathom that Sarkozy and Merkel would want anything that would repeat the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war—where the United States engaged in a strategy of cherry-picking support from European countries in order to bypass the EU as a whole—and that, having helped the Union to find a consensus position on Kosovo, that the president of France and the chancellor of Germany would then wish to undercut the very process. Nor could what Robert Kagan and Ivo Daalder said at the end of their Washington Post missive last week laying out their vision of a “Concert of Democracies”, they hedged their bets by arguing that the United States can and will act on its own vision “even when some of our democratic friends disagree”—be a sentiment that would be welcome in Paris or Brussels: that, in the final analysis, the U.S. will “do what it sees fit.”

So I believe that the transatlantic honeymoon engendered by the recent G-8 meeting (and shared concerns about disturbing trends in Putin’s Russia) will be short-lived. Whether Washington accedes to Gordon Brown’s request to release UK nationals held at Guantanamo Bay is an important first test. Whether the United States will forge ahead on Kosovo in the absence of any agreement at the United Nations will be another.

Perhaps, sooner rather than later, U.S. policymakers will accept that European leaders have their own perspectives on policy and priorities. Sarkozy and Merkel—and Gordon Brown, for that matter, expect to work with Washington, not simply follow an American agenda. Whether Washington—not only in the waning days of the Bush Administration but under the next Administration would be willing to move beyond simply informing and consulting with European allies but actually negotiating to forge a true and enduring transatlantic policy remains to be seen.

Nikolas K. Gvosdev is Editor-in-Chief of The National Interest , Senior Fellow at
The Nixon Center and an adjunct professor at Georgetown University and George Washington University.

Related Materials from the Atlantic Community

  • 1
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

Peter  Männer

August 13, 2007

  • 2
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
A very interesting article about fundamental changes in the international distribution of influence.

I fully agree to the point that London, Paris and Berlin will only support Washington´s policy when it has the better arguments. When Moscow is more convincing regarding its stance towards the Kosovo, it will receive more support from the continent. In case none is convincing from a european perspective, the european capitals won´t hesitate to strike a new path. This might be the best way to find a compromise.

"And it is clear that their overwhelming priority remains to reinvigorate the Franco-German partnership that is at the heart of the EU."

I can´t agree to this point. Sarkozy has used every opportunity to trample on franco-german relations since he is president.
Now that Berlin rules out a participation in the french military mission in Chad and restrained french ambitions over EADS, I think one can say that the german side clearly is too annoyed to worry about the relationship as well.

But apart from these differences I agree with Mr. Gvosdev´s point that both governments will hardly allow Washington to alienate each other with regard to world wide political aspects. With Gordon Brown succeeding Tony Blair I also expect that the Brits are pursuing a sovereign foreign policy again.
Ewan C. Watt

August 17, 2007

  • 0
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
“And it is clear that their overwhelming priority remains to reinvigorate the Franco-German partnership that is at the heart of the EU.”

I would add that Sarkozy is in fact doing everything possible to irritate the Germans - EADS and his constant criticism of the ECB in particular!

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at


You are in the archive of all articles published on from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website