Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

9 comments |  Print | E-Mail Best Of Think Tanks  

Green Jobs: A Major Opportunity for the US Labor Market

Christine Wörlen | Heinrich Böll Stiftung | October 2010

In the area of renewable energy, the transatlantic flow of ideas is taking place in an unusual direction. Germany is a worldwide leader in this sphere and the United States could benefit greatly by learning from its experience. Faced with an unemployment rate of nearly ten percent in the month of August, Americans might find the effect of green technologies on job creation particularly inspiring as Germany owes 300,000 new jobs to this sector alone. However, for such a transfer of ideas to turn into a success story, the central role of the legislative framework in fostering the renewables sector needs to be appreciated more fully. In this context, the federal level in the US can be equated to the EU in terms of legislative reach, while the German national experience is more applicable to the state level.

Three Midwestern American states appear particularly well suited to implementing a job creation program in the renewables field, inspired by the German example: Indiana, Minnesota, and Michigan. For one, they enjoy climatic conditions similar to Germany. Second, all three states have been particularly hard hit by the decline of the automobile industry. The entire region could really use a new influx of investment. Moreover, because of the harsh climate there, all three Midwestern states could easily attain significant energy savings by improving heating efficiency in buildings through the adaptation of German standards and greater reliance on insulation techniques. Especially in the case of Indiana, exploiting the power of wind energy would dramatically lower heating and energy costs for residents. It would also reduce Indiana's dependence on expensive coal imports. Furthermore, for a great many automobile manufacturers, it would be relatively easy to convert their assembly lines to produce parts for wind turbines. In Minnesota, following the German example by introducing feed-in tariffs for wind and solar power would be even more advantageous. Michigan on the other hand already made a name for itself with a campaign to attract high-tech businesses to the area by offering new firms attractive packages for setting up shop in-state. Targeting such campaigns at green firms would be all that is needed in order to promote the image of Michigan as a national center for research in the field of renewables. Moreover, Michigan stands to gain greatly from copying German financial schemes to promote the speedy construction of wind parks.

It is not only the Midwestern region of the US that would profit from reviving its economy by investing more heavily in clean energy, but the country as a whole. Throughout the United States, greater investment in green technologies would advance the cause of environmental protection and create greater awareness for the interconnected nature of economic growth and its effects upon the environment. Experts expect renewables to account for 40 percent of energy production in Germany by the year 2020. A similar success story in the United States would have significant security ramifications, as renewables would lessen the country's dependence upon foreign suppliers and thereby improve energy security on the national level.

This summary was prepared by the Atlantic Community editorial team from "Three Hundred Thousand Clean Energy Jobs" published here by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

 

 
Tags: | renewables | energy | us policy |
 
Comments
Diana  Lau

Tue, Oct 5th 2010, 21:46

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think it would be a great idea for the United States to invest in green technologies manufacturing. With most industries outsourced elsewhere for cheaper labor and property costs, we have an opportunity to contribute to the evolving renewable sector by creating new jobs and utilizing the manufacture of the product in our country.

Although initial costs may be high for the construction of manufacturing plants and wind parks, the long-term benefits are fruitful not only for the companies themselves but also for the general population who will realize the benefits of green technology.

If the government could invest in this sector, they would reap many benefits which would include providing work for the unemployed, decreased spending in energy bills and the possible launch of additional green innovations and technologies stemming from the government investment and promotion of green technology.
 
Donald Hamilton MacNab

Mon, Oct 11th 2010, 22:51

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The first problem that arises with a ‘green jobs agenda’ in the United States is the question as to just how many jobs it would produce. If the government creates x amount of jobs building and maintaining ‘green’ jobs, the number of these jobs must be measured against how many jobs will be lost in the ‘non-green’ job sector. For instance if the United States starts to replace its coal burning electrical grid with wind power, one must ask what is the offset of jobs lost in coal production, transportation, or the operation of coal powered electrical plants. I would say that this is not a job creation scheme as much as it is a job transfer plan. It should also be noted that presumably many of these jobs would be temporary, as most governmental infrastructure employment is.

Another problem arises with regards to the benefit of such a policy, and that is the issue of cost. If wind energy was the cheapest and most efficient form of electricity production, there would be no need for governmental intervention. Utility companies would simply convert their production to wind for the simple fact of profit incentive. This simple but Inconvenient fact is why the US government will probabaly emerge as primary financer of this technology. The cost of reconfiguring to a renewable electrical grid for a nation as large as the US should be astonishing and difficult given the current financial situation that Washington has found itself in (remember these are expensive government jobs, not private sector ones). It might be politically difficult to spend the amount of money required considering the US has an abundance of much cheaper coal. This does not even mention who would legally own these wind plants due to the fact that most utilities are privately owned (but price regulated) in the US. In addition to the above mentioned problems, for the foreseeable future there would likely be additional governmental expense in terms of subsidizing the cost difference between wind and coal.

I do not mean to be critical of your article, for I found it very interesting and informative. I am a supporter of renewable energy, and hope that the US can some day gain all of its energy needs from both domestic and renewable sources. I do have a problem with individuals ‘selling’ it to the public as an employment scheme, which I do not think in the long run it will be. Wind energy in the US is burdened by our abundant supply of cheap coal, and there will have to be major improvements in cost efficiency for it to be taken seriously as an energy source in this nation.

All the best :)

Don
 
Erica  Mukherjee

Tue, Oct 12th 2010, 23:04

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Yes, the creation of green jobs does often seem to be a political panaea for other harsh measures that take place in the name of the environment. Like nearly all aspects of environment policy it is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify. This is because it is impossible, at its root, to quantify the negative effects of global climate change.

For instance, let's say that one degree of global warming occurs over the next 5 years. We decide that that is a bad thing. How to calculate the negative effects? You can measure all the days over 90 degrees in a certain region, compare that to an average of the past fifty years, and state how much more electricity might have been used to cool homes during that summer. Then, of course, you would have to balance that out with winter heating cost reductions. You would have to look at habitat and animal behavior changes due to a new climate. Farmland might be lost in one place, but farmland gained in another. And that doesn't even go into quality of life issues. How can you quantify the increased risk of heat exhaustion?

As you can see, it is not possible to succienctly state the effects of green measures. Instead it is better to look at it in a case by case basis. In the case of job creation/destruction it would be fairly easy to quantify at least primary level effects. However, secondardy jobs, increased electricity bills, cleaner air/less health risk all have to be factored in as well...
 
Unregistered User

Tue, Oct 26th 2010, 14:29

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Ms Wörlen, Yes, you are right in saying that Germany's legislative framework and huge subsidies have created hundreds of thousands of jobs in renewable energies in the past years. However, these jobs are mainly in research & development, business development, international sales and production supervision, hence NOT in an area in which lots of unemployed are hired. From an employer standpoint, this means that the renewables sector is pulling human resources primarily out of the conventional energy sector. So what you see is a shift of human capital from one - old-fashioned and shrinking - sector to a growth area. That does not primarily help the unemployed but rather Germany's highly export-dependent economy to stay on top of developments.
 
Darrell Calvin Brown

Sun, Nov 21st 2010, 00:57

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think GM should begin plans, if they haven't already, for building President Obama a new Hybrid LImo. Maybe they could use the metal from the current one to keep the nostagia going. ya know. (LOL)
 
Unregistered User

Mon, Nov 22nd 2010, 19:36

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The United States already DOES invest greatly in the narrow slice of technology that you're interested in. In fact it's a leader. Of course the meme being the originator of what small minds think of as their facts, points to the reverse: "US bad, they drive SUVs and eat meat, amd, and, whetever this weeks repetative line is...."

Carry your mind over, for just a second, the stale old "R&D" argument: that the US does it in spades, and Europe very little. WHAT is it that you think makes up a large portion of that R&D?

The notion that economic growth can be initated with the preferred notion of do-gooders, let alone the intervention and control needed by government in the conduct of private industry's initiatives and research says very plainly that the advocates of these ideas are either not serious, or are constiutionally hostile to free enterprise for reasons that have little to do with their simplified economic and environmental arguments.

Moreover governments in free and even semi-free societies don't create jobs. All they can to is wreck the conditions under which the public creates jobs.

I suggest getting a job which is dependant on the forces of the non-government related, non-academic sectors and then develop a portrait of the scheme, asking yourself about the morality associated with the belief that a government can dictate not just HOW but WHAT people acting freely of their own vulition MUST do - because in most cases, when dictated to, people simply leave a business altogether. The only ones that stay are cronyistically intermeshed with political leadership and feed on the artificiality of subsidies.

You'll also realize that there is no such thing as a "green job", at least outside the imaginings of political campaigners and detached think-tank types.
 
Eoin  Michael  Heaney

Tue, Nov 23rd 2010, 18:05

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thank you everyone for your comments so far!

However, in order to keep the discussion as productive and open as possible, please register as members with Atlantic Community. It doesn't cost anything and only takes a minute. You can do so here:

http://www.atlantic-community.org/index/users/register

Kind regards,

Eoin.

 
Basia A Bubel

Tue, Dec 7th 2010, 08:51

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I appreciate this article very much. The US can learn a lot of Germany and Europe in many areas- especially in regards to the green sector. The Obama administration seems to want to move in a direction of creating green jobs so that is a big plus and a great step forward. Hopefully we continue that and expand the sector even more.
 
Michael D Baer

Tue, May 3rd 2011, 16:34

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Without an environmental policy in place, significant investment in the green technology sector will lag all other manufacturing sectors in the economy. Bringing economic prosperity to the midwest is more than insourcing the production of wind turbines, solar panels to midwestern states.

First, German, Spanish and the Chinese had government backed funding and policies to create a robust industry for green-energy manufacturing. This backing has allowed these firms to innovate and create efficiencies in making these products leading to significant reductions in cost.

Second, the leanring curve for production of green-materials will take time and require significant training and investment from a parent company. Without regulations requiring the United States to reduce their carbon emissions or subsidies for the green sector, it doesn't make business sense for a firm to invest in converting empty manufacturing plants when they currently cannot compete with the high quality low cost products coming out of Germany and Spain.

What is needed would be investment in the research and development sectors of our universities to build the human capital that will be at the forefront of clean energy innovation.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?