Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

6 comments |  Print | E-Mail Best Of Think Tanks  

Rare Earth Dispute Hampers Renewables

John Seaman | IFRI | November 2010

China’s trade policy could force the renewables sector to its knees – an industry that has registered 230% growth in global investments since 2005 and generated $162 billion in investments last year alone. After all, this successful sector suffers from a crucial weakness: Rare earth elements are essential ingredients in the production of many key technologies such as specialized magnets for hybrid vehicles. China controls 97 percent of the world market in rare earth and has announced that it will reduce exports by 72 percent in the second half of 2010. The West urgently needs to act in order to maintain its competitiveness.

The exploitation of rare earths is tremendously harmful to the environment. This is the case in particular in China, where numerous small actors engage – largely illegally – in their production. It is hence not entirely justified to suspect that China’s export restrictions are primarily geared toward hurting the West. Rather, the official Chinese policy needs to be seen in the context of a nationalization and better control of the production process within the country itself. It is crucially important for Beijing to rein in these environmentally destructive production methods that will prove enormously costly in the long run. Moreover, China wants to share in the global renewables boom and upgrade its production capacities. The country is attempting to use its near monopoly in order to become more attractive as a production site for green technologies. It is in this context that Chinese efforts to buy up rare earth deposits outside of China need to be seen as well. China itself possesses only 37 percent of worldwide deposits. Not least because of its lax environmental standards, the country has been able to exploit its resources more cheaply and hence dominate the world market up to date.

The West must succeed in becoming less dependent upon Chinese rare earth supplies, in order to gain greater autonomy in the development of renewables. The Japanese firm Toyota for instance has already begun securing its own sources abroad by investing in a Vietnamese mine. Like Japan, Europe also lacks deposits domestically. However, Europe has not undertaken any steps to assist industry in facing the challenges to be expected from the coming resource scarcity. By contrast, the United States is attempting to make domestic mines, which have been unprofitable in the past, attractive once again to investors. However, it is up to research and development efforts to come up with alternatives to rare earth elements for the high-tech sector. Recycling efforts must also be stepped up in order to guarantee a better exploitation of the rare earth elements available. After all, this is not merely a question of economic competiveness, but also one of national security, since the military depends on rare earth elements for numerous high-tech gadgets as well.

This summary was prepared by the Atlantic Community editorial team from “Rare Earth and Clean Energy: Analyzing China’s Upper Hand” published here by the Institut Francais des relations internationales.

 

 
 
Comments
Meital  Tzobotaro

Sat, Nov 6th 2010, 00:22

  • 5
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I agree with the author that other countries with rare earth mineral deposits should be explored in other parts of the world. I am a bit perplexed at how the world has created a dependency on China for mining these minerals even though it is widely known that they are essential for both economic reasons as well as national security. I was always under the impression that national security was always at the top of our priorities. Have we let cost-efficiency take over? It seems like the world loves to hate China when it does not comply with its demands. Why do we always react to problems after they come to the surface instead of utilizing prevention methods?
 
Diana  Lau

Thu, Nov 11th 2010, 00:15

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I agree with the author and the above comment. I feel the West is constantly reacting to situations instead of being proactive which puts us in a weak position in all aspects especially relative to China.

Countries of the West should start exploring other areas for rare earth supplies and wane the dependence we have on China, not only here but in all aspects for the sake of economic competitiveness. Attempting to make domestic mines is a good start trying to be proactive and with a combination of all the efforts suggested, increasing research and development and recycling efforts, there may be a chance to positively alter our vulnerability in the future.


 
Molly  Fearn

Thu, Nov 11th 2010, 15:59

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
In addition to the domestic rare mineral investments by China, they are also aggressively investing in mining in developing countries. For example, China and Peru have recently signed a Free Trade Agreement that came into effect in early 2010. This FTA shows how China is attempting to develop their mineral reserves outside of their own country, and this implies more risk to US security. Not only should the US be taking measures to ensure a strong domestic supply of rare minerals, the US should also be making proactive efforts to invest in developing extractive industries internationally.

It is important to note here that there are a lot of negative aspects of extractive industries, such as environmental contamination and development inequalities. While investing in this industry in developing countries, the US should bear in mind these risks and the negative effect that could be imposed on the stability of the developing economy's government. The current situation in Peru reflects the risks associated with the extractive industry. An interesting report is presented by the Council on Foreign Affairs: http://www.cfr.org/publication/21408/perus_mineral_wealth_and_woes....
 
Christopher  Connolly

Wed, Nov 17th 2010, 17:20

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
China has always taken a mercantilist approach to the economy, now we are seeing yet another example of state intervention, this time into the rare earths industry. I find it a little disturbing that countries well aware of China’s mercantilist policies, such as the US and Japan, are surprised at the current situation. China intervened and used strategic trade policies to create a comparative advantage for its rare earths industry as early as the 1980s. However much we may demonize China and its economic controls, its actions are actually rather savvy. First of all, it is stopping illegal mining and protecting the environment while conserving its natural resources. Secondly, having control of the market, China has decreased supply, thus keeping prices high. Finally, China recognizes that growth largely depends on the export of manufactured goods and therefore does not perceive a decrease in the export of a raw material as a hindrance to Chinese growth. In this light, controls on the exportation of highly demanded rare earths makes for a perfect tool of foreign policy.
 
Ximena  Benavente

Mon, Dec 6th 2010, 18:26

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think that in the short-term China has no interest in taking care of its environmental damage. It is clear that the priority now concentrates in the manufacturing production. So long as China keeps satisfying an increasing demand for manufactured goods, environmental issues will remain at the back of the list. Needless to say, all commentators have clearly expressed their concern for a Western dependency on a China that we still consider an enemy. The question should then be, what is the alternative solution? Will the United States reactivate its industrial power and be capable of overcoming the Chinese giant?

In the last 10 years we have seen that the US has deviated from its economic influence in the world to make that of a world military campaign. This has allowed China to penetrate into every country that formerly exclusively traded with the US. The US is not only loosing world leverage but weakening its domestic economy and harming its own population. In 2020 predictions take the US out of the top 5 world powers, by then China will probably have greater military capacity than the US.
 
Unregistered User

Thu, Dec 16th 2010, 18:09

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Like Japan, Europe also lacks deposits domestically."

Oh dear, do get your facts straight.

World class RE deposits exist in a Euro territory called "Greenland". The deposits are a mix of uranium and RE, are commercially viable and match those in China.

The reason China cornered the RE market is a a focus on developing its RE deposits whilst simultaneously ignoring its own (not bad) environmental legislation.

Recycilng of RE will help a little bit but will not address the requirements of a couple of thousand wind turbines (probably using permanent magnet generators) in the North Sea.

Anyway, the Euros need to pull their fingers out and start developing the Greenland deposits - there might even be a bit to sell to the US (bit only if they say "pretty please").
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?