Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

2 comments |  Print | E-Mail Best Of Think Tanks  

US House Votes for Energy Law: Time for an Energy Revolution?

Joshua Green | The Atlantic | June 2009

Barack Obama's entrance into the White House awoke all manner of hope for a fundamental turnaround in US energy policy. Yet this is not the first time that the world has looked to Washington in hope that the US would finally show the world how to be free of the fetters of fossil fuels. This was in 1977, as Jimmy Carter, shortly after assuming office, installed solar panels on the roof of the White House and declared the dawn of a new energy age. But Carter couldn't see it through. Can Barack Obama, three decades later, help a "Green Economy" finally come to fruition? The first step, at least, has been made: his long-anticipated environment and energy law was passed by a slim majority just a few days ago.

Obama made it clear at the beginning of his term that climate change and sustainable energy policies demand short- as well as long-term strategies. In the short term it is necessary to guard renewable energies from the economic collapse. Above all investment banks and hedge funds have profited from the tax incentives put in place by President Carter for renewable energies. Tax credits reaching into the hundreds of millions of dollars are available for financial investments in large infrastructure projects, credits which can  then be applied against profits that would primarily be earned in other fields (such as mortgage-backed securities). In such a manner Lehman Brothers, Wachovia and AIG came to be some of the most important lenders on the market. Since the beginning of the financial crisis, collapse has been lurking for the entire sector. To fill in the gaping holes in the financial system, the US government offered subsidies amounting to 32.7 billion US dollars. Another 134 billion was granted through credit guarantees in order to stimulate new investment. The most notable element of the political energy initiative is, however, that the US Department of Energy itself will explicitly invest in trend-setting "cleantech" enterprises. With the stroke of a pen, President Obama has made a federal agency the world's largest venture capitalist.

One of the most important components of Obama's long-term strategy is the proposal to set national standards dictating a minimum amount of renewable energy to comprise the total energy supply. At present many states already have such legal guidelines on the books, such as Texas, which produces more wind energy than Europe's number one wind-energy-producing country, Denmark. A further proposal, and perhaps the most significant, is the taxation of CO2 emissions - something along the lines of a cap-and-trade system. Both legal initiatives are integral parts of the environment and energy law, which is now waiting for a vote in the Senate. Among other things, the law will enforce efforts for a more promising market for renewable energy. No matter what the price, the law must foil any possibility of another radical reversal of energy policy in the future - as symbolized by Ronald Reagan's act of removing the solar panels from the White House roof, indicating his renunciation of any form of alternative energy.

This summary was prepared by the Atlantic Community editorial team from "The Elusive Green Economy" published here by The Atlantic

 

 
 
Comments
Andrey  Chubyk

Wed, Jul 8th 2009, 12:59

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
On the agenda of future meeting G-8 and G-20 the thema climate change will certanly take one of the leading positions. The main issue is, if all countries are willing to accept obligations on CO2 emissions at the expense of own economics development. China has already declared not to participate on G-8 in Italy. Who will be the second?
 
Unregistered User

Mon, Aug 10th 2009, 02:47

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Civilizations have gone through many advances which created the opportunity to improve our ability to gain resources and adapt our economy in new ways. These advances could be as simple as domesticating horses to improve our speed and distance of travel, to building roads, railroads, combustion engine and automobiles, electricity, written and spoken languages, industrial production, telegraph, telephone, radio, computers, internet, to finally we reach the present and our ecology friendly technology revolution. Which just as before many find it a natural progression in our evolution. Once again, the Gods inspire human thoughts to leap us forward in our evolution coefficient (an increased ability in one of the factors required for survival of the species).

I see by your juxtaposing President Carter and President Reagan the implication that, Democrats want to move forward with technology, while Republicans want to stay with the secure thing we already have.

The difficulty now is many countries have decided to move ahead with many types of ecology friendly technology projects, and for the USA to strictly stay with only the tried and proven is causing us to fall behind in technology standing compared to the rest of the world.
If I may go beyond just Democrat versus Republican, European versus Russian, China versus India etc. add-nausea? Let me share something I discovered about the success of co-operation.

Charles Darwin Guide to Survival
Tips and tricks used by Charles Darwin to survive during the Voyage of the HMS Beagle:
While reading I noticed Ecologist Darwin being in situations where he had to insure his own survival. Traveling as he did, Charles Darwin encountered a variety of people, animals, and environments that challenged his own understanding and capabilities. In order to survive his 1830’s journey, Ecologist Darwin employed many tactics. I will attempt to list some of these tactics for success.

Strong Partners
First and foremost is the partnering with the British Royal Navy. This provided a great deal of experience and strength both in navigation and security and also intelligent aware people to discuss observations. The HMS Beagle and her Captain and crew knew the routes, had connections with other Navies and governments which helped the ecologist to get around the world and into remote areas in order to observe the diverse populations of people and animals. The Captain and crew of the HMS Beagle also collected some species of animals and did a much better job of cataloging every detail about the species to include the exact location it inhabited.

Friendship
The Ecologist or Naturalist as the specialty was termed in the 1830’s often work with many different cultures. Charles Darwin had a very friendly nature and was quick to make friends and learn the customs of the local people to avoid offending anyone. He carried extra navigation compasses to give as gifts in South America as the people there loved and needed such instruments.

Local Guides
Naturalist Darwin had connections with the military in each area. They would provide protection during long expeditions. He also hired personal guides that had expertise in certain locations and specialties. These guides kept him safe and helped him avoid the dangers from the wars with the Indians occurring in South America in the 1930’s. Guides also helped him to never overstay his welcome at ranches. Ranch owners would have large dinners and social events to share stories with Naturalist Darwin. These friends would often try to convince him to stay even as he was getting ready to continue his journey. The guide would explain to the Naturalist that it was a custom, and under no circumstances were they to stay, as continued parties may use up resources needed for Ranch.

Awareness
Charles Darwin, the Royal Navy, South American Gauchos (Cowboys) all had a good sense of awareness that kept them safe. Wild Jaguars roamed certain locations and people on small boats at dock sometimes had to fend off jaguars. The more time he spent with these people in each environment the greater his awareness became. Not only could he recognize animals by site, he also learned to recognize some by sound.

Professor Knowledge
Ecologist Charles Darwin understood a great deal more about his surroundings because of his training and knowledge. He had started as a medical doctor, knew geology and had read the works of other biologists, naturalists or scientists like, Aristotle, John Hershel, and Alexander von Humboldt. With this knowledge he understood more about his surroundings than the average person.

Reflections and Research
Somehow Charles Darwin just like the rest of us has some inspiration to take our understanding to a new level. He constantly reflected on his journeys, his conversations with people and his own concepts. He researched by reading the works of others to expand his knowledge and he experimented with ways to approach other intellectuals and converse with them about the art of the Naturalist.

Colleagues
Colleagues were a very important part of Ecologist Darwin’s art. He needed friends to share ideas with and to hear their ideas. He did withdraw at times to concentrate and write. However, he always came back to visit his friends and share his latest findings. He valued his colleagues and their expertise and tried to give them credit when he could, even to the point of handing over complete sets of specimens and research to colleagues more suited for that aspect of the job.

Conclusion
Naturalist Charles Darwin led by example. He lived in a very tough world, which required team work, concentration and understanding. He shared the work and the credit with colleagues. He believed many others were very intelligent and tried to give them credit. He displayed incredible adaptability in the face of many challenges and survived to tell about it. The team made this happens. Cooperation. Letting each person or set of persons do their gifted part of the contribution. If there is one thing certain about evolution is that each person and team has an innate desire to contribute to the short and long term survival of the species and environment in which we depend on for our survival.

Jeff Hathor
Evolution Theorist
www.engfuture.com

Tags: | ecology | economy | Team work | cooperation | evolution |
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?