Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

December 23, 2011 |  7 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Stewart  Munn

A Correct and Courageous Step

Stewart Munn: The French Parliament is right to pass the Armenian Genocide Bill. Turkish threats and counter measures are a price worth paying when fighting for justice. Denying the Armenian Genocide and pandering to those who deny it is hypocritical of the West in an era where our civilization is trying to be a shining light to those in the Arab world who are casting off dictatorships.

For all the tragedies of the First World War, the Armenian Genocide is probably the least widely known. If you ask most people about the Great War they will tell you about the horrible sufferings of the Somme, Paschendale and Gallipoli. However, if you mention the fate of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire to a layman, you would mostly be greeted with blank expressions.

This ignorance is a result of almost a century of forceful and aggressive PR campaigning by the Turkish State to deny, distort and misrepresent history. Historical estimates suggest that 1.5 million ethnic Armenian Christians died at the hands of the ailing Ottoman Empire between 1915-1923. This is coupled with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Assyrians and Greeks around the same time. These deaths were inflicted through brutally enforced deportations, grotesque death marches and systematic murder in death camps. At the time of the Genocide, the Ottoman Empire was on its last legs and faced with the prospect of a Russian invasion from the east. The Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians were seen as a problematic ‘fifth column' within the Empire; Christians, who would, as the theory goes, supposedly side with the Russians as liberators. Ridding the Empire of this insurrectionist element was seen as a necessary action for the Turks to win the war and maintain their Empire.

The heir to the Ottoman Empire, the Republic of Turkey, has energetically denied that the deaths of Armenians from 1915-1923 are genocide. Instead insisting that these deaths were part of the larger conflict that was the First World War. In fact this campaign to conceal the truth has been very successful.

Only twenty countries have officially acknowledged that the Ottomans carried out genocide against their Armenian subjects. The United Kingdom and United States are not among those twenty countries. It appeared at one point that Barack Obama would add his voice to the calls of recognition of the plight of the Armenians. However, once in office he subsequently backtracked. Turkey is seemingly too important an ally for the United States to speak the truth to without fear of upsetting her.

Fortunately for those who want to see justice, the French Parliament is unwilling to bend to Turkish demands. The French parliament has approved a bill that will make denying genocide, but implicitly the Armenian genocide, a crime. The Bill was supported by both the UMP and the Socialists, showing both sides of the political spectrum in the Fifth Republic are united on this issue. France is one of the twenty countries who recognise the Genocide, regardless of Turkish threats.

These threats have now manifested into tit-for-tat actions. The Turkish Government, under Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has now frozen all political and diplomatic ties with France. Military ties have also been suspended in retaliation to the French Bill. This is not an uncommon action from the Turkish State. We have seen over the past few years the somewhat immature nature to their foreign diplomacy. The dramatic deterioration of relations with Israel being a case in point. However, France and Turkey are NATO allies and with Turkey seeking to join the EU, this only complicates matters.

France under Nicholas Sarkozy is hostile to Turkish entry into the EU. Turkish treatment of the Kurds, her poor human rights record, the issue of Cyprus and long history of military interference in the political arena have long scared the French off from allowing Turkey to join ‘their' club. The issue of the Armenian Genocide is also a major sticking point for the French. Whilst the issue of the Genocide remains there is no chance of Turkey joining the EU.

France is right to vote in parliament on the Armenian issue. The issue of the Holocaust, Rwanda or Bosnia is not contentious with other Western Governments. The UK, US, Germany and all other Western Governments agree that these were acts of mass murder, genocide and systematic slaughter. So what's stopping them acknowledging the truth about the Armenians? Fear of provoking Turkey should not be a reason for denying the truth. Turkey is a friend of the West and she has to respect that our Governments and our people are not content to sit quietly while injustices, however old, are not rectified. This is an issue that transcends religion and race. It is an issue of humanity. The million-plus Armenians who perished at the hands of the Ottomans deserve justice, and the French political establishment is acting in a courageous and correct way. It is a shame that the UK and the US will not follow suit and commit to a concrete act of solidarity to the Armenian people.

This writer believes that a strong relationship between the West and Turkey should continue and that Turkey's presence in NATO is a positive element to the alliance. But this should not be at the cost of our principles and ideologies that Western culture is founded on: rule of law, justice, tolerance, freedom of speech and equality. Denying the Armenian Genocide and pandering to those who deny it is hypocritical of the West in an era where our civilisation is trying to be a shining light to those in the Arab world who are casting off dictatorships. For the West, and especially leading lights such as the UK and US, to sidestep the Armenian issue in favour of an easy ride with Turkey sends out the wrong message to those we mean to inspire. Principles are easily lost in the modern political world, and because of the actions of her Parliament, the French deserve to be praised.

Stewart Munn is a civil servant for the UK Government with specialist interest and experience in US and European politics and Middle Eastern Affairs. He is also studying towards an MA in public administration and global governance.

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | Armenian Genocide |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

December 23, 2011

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Good for France to condemn the Turkish genocide and finally give some justice to the Armenian victims. Now is the time that the Western Governments recognize the genocide against 700,000 ethnic Serb civilians committed by Croatia's and Bosnia's Nazi puppet governments during the WW2. Serbs, Jews and Gypsies were the groups on Croatia's and Bosnia's WW2 list of extermination.

It is sad that the Croatia has been allowed into the EU prior to apologizing for the extermination of 700,000 ethnic Serb civilians in WW2. Shame on the Western nations for not denouncing Croatia's genocide.
 
Paul-Robert  Lookman

December 28, 2011

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
While threats and counter measures are perhaps not the wisest way for the Turks to respond to the French Armenian Genocide Bill, the law is uncalled for. The writing of history is not a matter for laws. The debate on the genocide on Armenians, which in Turkey was beginning to emerge, is with the French law now “killed”.

The hysteria on an issue like this is not a phenomenon in which Turkey is unique. Any discussion in France on genocide in Algeria or Indochina will undoubtedly produce similar reactions. Or in the Netherlands on war crimes in Indonesia, or in Britain or other Western states on their colonial past, or the way the American invaders dealt with native Indians, … These are all historical facts, to be released by historians and the mass media. But are laws the way to make these atrocities open to discussion? I don’t think so.
 
Unregistered User

January 1, 2012

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The Japanese have also ignored and denied their war crimes. The Korean 'comfort women' have never received an apology for their shocking treatment and the Japanese have also altered their school textbooks so that no facts that place them in a negative light are taught in their school curriculum.
 
Johannes  Steger

January 4, 2012

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
“If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals”, so general Curtis LeMay, cited by Robert McNamara in the documentary “The Fog of War”. McNamara, referring to the US-Japanese War and war crimes, asks himself further: “But what makes [war crimes] immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?”
This is the eternal dilemma of international politics. What can one do about it? Push through the parliament some bills to condemn war crimes? All the attempts of theorizing “just war” have been and will be vain attempts, if not mere ideology in favour of the intervening armies, states and their interests.
Most of the states are born out of violence, and in war they commit war crimes. France is no exception. I am not thinking only at its colonial legacy but also about French actions in the recent Rwandan genocide. France choose to take side of the Habyarimana regime and did not intervene to stop the massacre.
The case Rwanda shows, moreover, that to blame just one party of genocide may not be the hole truth, as the theory of the “double genocide” may be valid to some point.
Think of the Second World War. In Italy, thanks to the United States, won the republican and antifascist resistance. However, there have been war crimes too, on both sides. And since the last decade it became quite fashionable among historians to consider the war of liberation a sort of“civil war”.
Think at the First World War. One should remember the resentment and controversy caused by the War Guilt Clause of the Versailles Treaties. Moreover, one should compare the huge indemnity payments imposed on France after the Franco-Prussian War to these of the Versailles Treaties. Have they been “just”?
There is, fortunate or unfortunate, no such thing as justice neither in politics nor in history. To look for it may be quite illusionary, if not warmongering.
I think that the promotion of the Genocide Bill belongs to the same hypocrisy as denying it. However, it would be in Turkeys interests to elaborate on the dark sides of its history, as they could improve their international stance – at least ideologically.
By the way, what are the political gains of Mr Sarkozy from the Genocide Bill?
 
Kazimierz  Wiesak

January 6, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
As to World War II, media make an impression that 100 percent of war crimes have been committed by Germans and zero percent by the Allied powers. So, I took the average and I got that 50 percent of war crimes were committed by Germany and 50 percent by the Allied Powers.
 
valentine anatolevich akishkin

January 9, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Laws are enforced to abide violence, crime, or any other forms of felony relevant to the moment. Genocide, fascism, racism, colonialism, segregation are things that have a long history, are still attributes of contemporary life and must definitely be condemned. I doubt there is a country in the world that had not, in some form, been involved in humiliating or revoking the rights of people; either of its own country or people living beyond its borders. The easiest way to make the ghosts of history infect our lives is to make a selective pluck of the miserable crimes from the abounding option of felonies the world round, particularly when done with some current and rational political aim. We could live our lives off involving ourselves in an endless tussle assessing the maladies of the past leaving neglected the overgrowing belligerent apportion of today’s depravities.
Propaganda or practical activities provoking: genocide, fascism, racism, colonialism, segregation in any form should definitely be forbidden by law. But there is a very narrow line we must not cross while doing this. Nobody can forbid anybody to have his own opinion and express it whenever he wants however hostile it might seem to anyone with another perception. All other approaches are counterproductive and would eventually backfire. Humanity is a mixture of evil and good and will always be. God foresaw to it that the good would always overweigh the bad, but he was clever enough to withhold from making it a law.

Tags: | genocide |
 
Talha Bin  Tariq

January 10, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Very well written Article :)

I always admire the way France take actions against such issues & things ..
Though,It all depends upon how much inner strength people and government possess and how much can they oppose the negative forces

Regards,
Talha Bin Tariq
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?