Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

March 27, 2009 |  5 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Marek  Kubista

An Opponent to Barroso Would Reduce EU's Democratic Deficit

Marek Kubista: The European elections are fast approaching, yet there is little suspense in the air. Perhaps that’s because the outcome is pre-determined: the PPE will win and Jose Manuel Durao Barroso will be reappointed. In April, the left will be given a final chance to decide on a candidate and strengthen European democracy

The deal had been brokered three months before the actual elections: Barroso will stay in Brussels for another 5 years. During the European Council Summit on March 19, the French, German and Italian governments officially expressed their support to his reappointment. The British, Portuguese and Spanish governments did so months ago. What is striking is that leaders like Sarkozy showed little enthusiasm for the idea, but no other “rightist” candidate was acceptable to Member States.

This is surprising as Barroso's policy during his first term in office was one of the worst ever to be carried out from a European Commission President. Under his mandate, three different countries rejected both the Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty. He has without doubt failed to justify and promote a new project for European citizens. Indeed, the few significant projects which he endorsed, like the energy-climate package, proved limited when adopted. Barroso's refusal to challenge Member States reveals the prioritizing of personal ambition over serving the European Commission's mission; i.e. the promotion of the general will as opposed to Member States' will. This attitude then reduced the leverage and the credibility of the institution. Finally, let us not forget that in the face of one of the biggest financial and economic crises of the century, Barroso did nothing but procrastinate. An illustrating example is that of September 2008, when the Commissioner responsible for Internal Market and Services, Charlie McCreevy asserted that the crisis was due to an excess of regulation! And yet, despite all that, Barroso will certainly be re-appointed.

Indeed, one would think that with such poor results, the Socialists would seize the opportunity and stand united behind a candidate. But divisions still take hold. The British, Portuguese and Spanish governments’ decision to back Barroso must have dealt a severe blow to their morale. While poor performance and the financial crisis —the product of Reaganian liberalism— should combine to boost ambitions, the European Socialists did not reach agreement on a possible candidate in December or in March. The Head of the European Socialists, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen was the most favored candidate. But as Sarkozy and Merkel decided to support another Dane, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, for the position of NATO General Secretary, the idea of having two Danes leading two international institutions would be immediately refused.

It’s slowly dawning on the European Socialists that they have little chance to win the election and no one is ready to tarnish their political career by accepting a possible setback. Therefore, the European Socialists are clearly demonstrating that they have forgotten the core of the political mission, that is, to give meaning to their political commitment. Thanks to this political cowardice, the principles of democracy will once more not apply to the EU. While strictly speaking the EU is not a democracy, there is no excuse for not being democratic. One of the basic tenets of democracy is accountability. People have the opportunity to vote for a majority at the European Parliament, and according to the unwritten rule, the Member States will appoint as Head of the European Commission, the one who corresponds to the majority vote.

It’s no secret that European citizens feel they have no influence on the EU political process. By taking away all choice, the mistrust towards the European Commission and the EU in general will only increase. The EU needs to be perceived as a legitimate body and it is not Barroso's policy of less transparency and more legislation that will do so. Increasing the legitimacy of the EU means providing people with the opportunity to influence the political process. For this reason, the Socialists must designate a candidate before April 24th. Even if they do not win the election, having a political figure representing their party will contribute to increasing the legitimacy of the EU against the charge of the democratic deficit.

Marek Kubista is a MA European Affairs student at Sciences Po Paris.

  • 9
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Andrey  Chubyk

March 27, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think, it is not the worthest, what will happen. We are facing strong times, but decisions to be made are irretrievable. It will hopefully show summit G-20, NATO-meeting and other big events, planned for spring and summer.
Jose Manuel Durao Barroso may not represent sufficient democracy as for wide EU society but have to performe a lot of things, started by the EU under his duty time.
EU has to hurry up in different spheres and if someone think, it is enough time for discussion, it is not the case now - crisis goes dipper, new challenges stay at door and everything must be done very quickly.
We would wish to have democracy but strongly proportioned due to the reality
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

March 29, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Barroso did nothing but procrastinate" one can't clearer !

the whole lot in Brussels does too, they autoreproduct and care only for their own position

it's the socialism revolution with chlorophorm, some old apparatchniks must laugh in their graves
 
Peter  Männer

April 1, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Barroso's refusal to challenge Member States reveals the prioritizing of personal ambition over serving the European Commission's mission; i.e. the promotion of the general will as opposed to Member States' will."

Well maybe this was the major reason for the biggest member states to favor him again? With leaders like Barroso, the biggest countries have the opportunity to project their ideas upon the entire EU! It wouldn't be clever for them to abandon him..

What you call a democratic deficit might turn out to be a strength in difficult times - a signal of unity, which prevents turmoil in the EUs parliament and ensures that the strategy of endorsing the Lisbon Treaty (or its content) goes on unhindered.

And maybe decisive members of the socialist party think of their countries first and thus do not want to see Barroso removed either?
 
Marek  Kubista

April 2, 2009

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
To Peter Manner, thank you for your comment: I completely agree with you on the fact that member states favor Barroso because they have more influence than they had when there is a strong leadership as it was with Delors, for example.
But, I disagree on the fact that the democratic deficit could turn out to be a strength: it is not a signal of unity to agree on a weak leader. If the Commission does not have a strong leadership, then Europe is lead by States and we know where it goes: it was called the Concert of Nations during 2 centuries. The point of having european institutions is to have an equilibrium between Member States, a common interest embodied by the Commission and the Peoples. And finally I do not call competition between two different candidates a turmoil as you do, I prefer calling it democratic procedures. And it has no influence whatsoever on the ratification of the Lisbon treaty.
 
Unregistered User

April 4, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
In Brussels the latest spin is that Barroso goes Obama. look www.tellbarroso.eu, a light copy-paste of Obama's campaign tools. Runned by a think tank of the EPP, it is obvious what is the thinking behind the project. Well, maybe due to all these moves finally the European politics becomes at least slightly more interesting.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?