Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

August 5, 2009 |  12 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

This function is for registered users of the Atlantic Community. Please register or log in.

Topic Kosovo: Balkan Success Story and Future EU Member?

Elizabeth Pond: The Kosovar State has so far been successful in the most pressing challenges facing the country since its secession from Serbia. However, excessive political interference with societal institutions alludes to the long way of development and improvement ahead.

Kosovo can point to three major accomplishments—and one major failure—in its 17-month life so far.

The successes are recognition by more than 60 states of Kosovo's independence from Serbia; the negligible ethnic tension between majority Albanians and minority Serbs since independence; and the progressive taming of Kosovo north of the Ibar River.

Of course, 62 out of 192 United Nations members are not enough to win quick UN membership for Kosovo against the opposition of Russia. But recognition by the United States, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and three-fourths of European Union members—and participation even by EU members that do not recognize Pristina in the Union's rule-of-law EULEX mission in Kosovo—confers legitimacy. So does Kosovo's new membership in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Equally important for Kosovars' peace of mind is Brussels' steady promise of future EU membership as the fledgling country qualifies for it. (No, there is no visible solution yet to the conundrum of how to admit more-developed Serbia to the club some years before Kosovo is ready but still not give Belgrade a veto on later Kosovo membership. A solution will be found, though.) The EU's commitment to Kosovo's "European perspective" is attested to by the intensive EULEX tutoring of local police, prosecutors, and judges this year under Kosovo's "supervised" independence.

The second attainment is adherence by the Pristina government to the promises it made under the original independence plan of Finnish diplomat Martti Ahtisaari to construct a multiethnic, decentralized society. There has been sporadic low-level ethnic violence in Serb-majority northern Kosovo, but quiet cooperation between NATO, EULEX, Kosovar, and even Serbian intelligence and police officials has kept local confrontations from escalating. Moreover, most Kosovo Serb policemen, after a year of boycotting the Kosovo Police Service (KPS) under Belgrade's pressure, have finally accepted that their future lies with Kosovo and returned to their posts.

And while Pristina has given no incentives to Serbs who fled Kosovo after the 1999 war to return, it has tried to implement the decentralization that would give the remaining ethnic Serb communities substantial autonomy. Decentralization is sluggish not because of the government, but because of the reluctance of Kosovar Serbs so far to elect new officials under Kosovo laws and dump the local hierarchies set up two years ago by the old hardline government in Belgrade. The Kosovar Serb resistance is softening, however, as the NATO-led KFOR troops, EULEX, KPS, and Belgrade government too collaborate in squeezing out some of the old ultranationalist Serb bosses and smugglers in northern Kosovo. One hint of this process came with a Kosovo prosecutor's recent summons to long-time north Mitrovica boss Milan Ivanovic to answer questions about potential criminal charges.

Further harbingers are the leaks that EULEX (and not the vestigial UN Mission in Kosovo) is now the intermediary for cooperation between the Pristina and Belgrade governments—and that EULEX may soon upgrade its half-year-old passive monitoring of vehicle traffic at the fuel-smuggling paradise of Gates 1 and 31 on the north Kosovo-Serbian border and begin to collect the legal tariffs, in joint management with Serbian government tax officials. A final hint is the success of the EU in the condition it demanded for lifting the visa requirement by 2010 for Serbian (as well as Montenegrin and Macedonian) travelers in the Schengen area. Kosovar Serbs, even if they acquire computer-readable Serbian passports, will still require visas to travel to EU countries for as long as Kosovar Albanians do.

As for Kosovo's major failure, it is the conspicuous political interference with the media and with law enforcement by police and judges. One of the most hard-hitting Kosovar journalists, BIRN's Jeta Xharra, has recently received an apparent death threat for her blunt reporting; Western diplomats have warned Pristina officials that she must not be harmed. And EULEX's first-year assessment of rule of law in Kosovo in July, however delicately, clearly condemned official corruption and coverups and the anemic fight against organized crime.

The bottom line, then, is that Kosovo is doing better than many observers expected at its birth a year and a half ago—but that it still has a very long way to go to reach that grail of EU membership.

Elizabeth Pond, a Berlin-based American journalist, is the author of Endgame in the Balkans (Brookings) and "Serbia's Choice" in last spring's issue of Survival.

Previous Balkan Week articles on Atlantic Community:

Tomorrow: Tomislav Marsic: The Blocked Bloc

  • 25
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | EULEX | ethnic conflict | EU membership | Kosovo |
 
Comments
Colette Grace Mazzucelli

August 5, 2009

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Hi Elizabeth,

Thank you for this insightful commentary. I still remember your excellent presentation for the Bosch Alumni in New York, DC, and other US cities many years ago.

Regarding the major failure you cite above, how much does this have to do with the re-integration of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) into the system within the ranks of the police?

As I recall, the rise of that organization during the 1990s was to keep the attention of the international community firmly fixed on Kosovo after Dayton.

Given the successes you cite above in terms of international recognition and the Union's European perspective for Kosovo, what is the role of the remnants of the KLA as it has been transformed within the State apparatus?

All the best and greetings from New York, Colette
Tags: | Kosovo |
 
Unregistered User

August 5, 2009

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Subtle propaganda and spin.

Recognition by 62 states! Most of the EU and Anglo Saxon countires, but then who else? Most of the rest are micro states like the Maldives. You mention Saudi Arabia but what about the rest of the muslim world, or Africa or Latin America? There won't be many more recognitions now before the ICJ verdict which will probably favour Serbia's position (assuming that it remains impartial). After that Kosovo, i.e. the US and the EU will have to start negotiting with Serbia about Kosovo's status. So where's Kosovo's success?

"So does Kosovo's new membership in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank." This doesn't confer any legitimacy on Kosovo's status whatsoever. A quick check on the internet and it's easy to see that voting rights at the IMF is determined by contributions from member countries. As the US and EU member states plus a few more pass the 50% threshold needed to grant Kosovo membership of the IMF and World Bank that's no recognition of legitimacy, just an example of two institutions dominated by the US and EU. legitimacy will only be conferred by a seat at the UN which simply isn't going to materialise.

As for all the talk about the reduction in ethnic tension, cooperation with EULEX and Serbian policemen going back to work in Kosovo, this success has nothing to do with the temporary Albanian administration in Pristina but everything to do with Serbian govt in Belgrade. Without Serbia's cooperation with EULEX and KFOR and UNMIK, the situation in Kosovo would most likely be very different today. this si the success of the Serbian govt not the Kosovo Albanian "government".
 
Pawel Jan Olszewski

August 5, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Elizabeth Pond

I read your article and have some comments.

At first the hipothesis in the title of your article - If I understood well is that the Kosovo is the EU success story. Unforunatelly in my thesis it is neither EU nor other international organization success but it is the success of the US policy in the Balkans but also a huge problem `Pandora Can` left in the Balkans for EU.

2nd: The recognition of Kosovo does not mean legitimacy as there are many different ways of legitimizing the state. EU did not recognized it itself as one but left the decission to its members. What is more there are around 5000 nations in the world and just 200 nations has its own states while in the same time Albanians have Albania and Kosovo which right before the war was inhabited by Serbs in majority.

3rd: Kosovo membership in International Monetary Fund and the World Bank is the result of the donors policy. The state which has no economy needs money to exist and Kosovo receives it from international community in the same way as Palestine. (Right after the announcement of the sovereignity EU gave 1.2 billion Euro and organized further financial help)

4th: Brussels promise Kosovo future membership when in the same time Kosovo does not fulfill any of the even basic requirements or rules. Talking to Kosovo about EU membership is like telling a child : "When you will be very tall you will reach the sky"

5th: Tensions between the society in Kosovo are not sporadic but are frequent and usual.

6th: Eulex activity in Kosovo is the EU wish for fast democratization and stabilization of judiciary system and police forces.

Ms Mazzucelli wrote in her comment about the KLA matter which is very important but rarely mentioned publicly. I can just add that the former Chief Commander of KLA (Hasim Thaci) is now the present prime minister of Kosovo. So the guerrilas become the democrates. Furthermore Kosovo brought many tensions and not only in the Balkan region (Serbia, Macedonia) but aslo woken up the nationalistic movements all around the world, speed up the process of growing nationalistic ideas in theoretically cosmopolitan, open minded and internationalistic European societies, and gave the explanation for more secessionistic or anectionistic movements and ideas (Osetia, Abchazia)

What is more Kosovo is not a simple question and needday but day and reliable analysis, which are now very rare.

Best Wishes

Paweł Olszewski
 
Gregor  Schueler

August 6, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thank you for the article.
Just a few comments:


As has been pointed out, Kosovo has mainly been recognized by western states like the US (its allies and protectorates like Saudi Arabia and Taiwan) and member-states of the EU. It cannot be described as being a fully recognized sovereign country in the world community pending the end of the dispute over its legitimacy. Russia isn't likely to lift its veto on membership of the UN either.

Some process has been made in the consolidation of internal sovereignty with the KSF soon to replace the KPS, which as mentioned above included a lot of former KLA fighters.
But the country's unresolved status is hindering economic development.
Kosovo is dependent on Foreign Aid and Foreign Direct Investment is lower than in many African countries. The EU cannot and shouldn't admit a developing country of such young and unstable sovereignty and once Serbia is admitted, the process is likely to be disrupted again.

The EU needs to push for Kosovo to be recognized by Russia and China in the UN Security Council and once that is achieved work to resolve the still on a larger than obvious scale remaining ethnic tensions and develop the region economically. It will at least be another ten years until EU membership becomes a serious issue for Kosovo.
 
Rudi  Guraziu

August 6, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Elizabeth, that is a fair and objective analysis!

Pawel, I strongly disagree with your perception of the Kosovo case!!!
 
Unregistered User

August 6, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Mr. Radoslav, or whoever that you are my dear colleague, please allow me to address you so as you are on the blog I immensely appreciate, you are apparently trying to give specific internal Serb's point of view that is so inadequate and its well known that it costs our nation so much through the all difficult (terrible) time but what the time isn't been difficult, mostly always in human not only past but in contemporary world as well. There is nothing subtle and spin in international relations. We are coevals of this contemporary world and we are all living in that with all its imperfections but there are many international standards guarantying sovereign nation exactly same rights as well as others nation and we'd better to have found best solution to us within that recognized standards because otherwise we may find ourselves among 5000 nations club, respectable Mr. Olszewski mentioned that term. By the way Iam thankful to Mr. Olszewski because I didn't know exact total figures out of lucky 200 on the complicated earth planet. Who to blame and condemn for Kosovo, for having been stripped off national territory, for so miserable conditional term in 1999 Kumanovo negotiation and latter also in Union negotiation and accession process, whom condemn and blame to for me personaly , whom for my families to having been sacrificed yearly for my granddad death when he was murdered at the end of second ww by his fellow countrymen (Serbs also) for his being against fascism as a ex-yu communist and also being against creation of internal ex - yu borders lately taken as international full legitimacy at the beginning of nineties breakdown.
Who then nobody, nobody any more, and it must be clear as well as is clear that we are in full compliance with the International law regulation doesn't matter where any of us lives , is it in Serbia or Bosnia&Herzegovina, Monte Negor, Croatia, FYR Macedonia even Kosovo. Respectable Mrs. Pond only gives factography and sh's trying to do it correctly. Within her overview, I can find more positive prospects for Serbs not only on Kosovo north. Returning of Serbs policemen under KPS is advanced step to them and theirs family after theirs so thoughtless and no coordinated quitting apparently upon Beograd's hint and then miserable closing state doors to them for any professional duty. Their return is also in favor of usual people repatriation in other areas then North. Apart from laborious Serbs issue, Mr. Pond pointed out well another tough issue in Kosovo too more focused to Albanians as majority. But there is room also for commenting of Mrs. Pond for obvious paralogism since mentioning only corrupt cases on Kosovo north by some Serb fuel smugglers. Its well known to all and its about general negative trait so imminent to character of representative of my nation to misuse power for private benefits, but it's also well known fact about Albanians mafia and theirs underground control of majority chains of smuggling like drugs, migrants, human trafficking, high tax goods etc. to and out of not only this Region but Europe widely. I aim not just to the underground's connection of Albanians mafia in general, but exact Albanian clans from Kosovo which are the subject of intensive pursuit by various world sophisticated intelligence services. It's about exact families and clans with theirs full names and surnames and its a well know fact. Again and again, I plead to all of us only to be a bit more correct and detached.
 
Unregistered User

August 6, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dragoslav Rubez

"There is nothing subtle and spin in international relations." That's just being plain naive.

"Respectable Mrs. Pond only gives factography and sh's trying to do it correctly." It's obvious from this statement that you know very little about the situation in Kosovo and it's history within Serbia and instead of insinuating that my facts are incorrect, show the forum some facts that contradict what I stated instead of just rambling incoherently.

" we'd better to have found best solution to us within that recognized standards" Absolutely correct. It's called International law. As the US, EU and Serbia are members of the UN and agree to abide by it's laws then they should do exactly that. Instead they try to create a new state from an existing one which the UN supposedly says is illegal as all UN members are supposed to respect the sovereignty of fellow countries.

" as well as is clear that we are in full compliance with the International law regulation doesn't matter where any of us lives" Explain that to the Kosovo Albanians and their backers - the US and EU. Kosovo declaring independence is against international law which is what Serbia is hoping to cement with a decision at the ICJ.

The question you should be asking yourself is why Kosovo is so important to the US and EU? In a nutshell, it's coal. It's no coincidence that the US invaded Iraq and then Afghanistan. It's positioning itself to make sure it has access to energy supplies. With the world's population growing day by day and with fewer resources to go around it's only a matter of time before more countries go to war over access to water and energy supplies. The US has just struck first, that's the only real difference so it's making every effort to try to legitimise Kosovo's "independence". As long as Serbia has a legal legitimate claim to Kosovo it makes life much more difficult for the US. that's the REAL reason why NATO intervened in Kosovo where the body count was around 10,000 (total of all nationalities) compared with say Rwanda or Sudan where the death toll was in the millions. Milosevic's and Serbia's mistake was to fail to understand the US interest in Kosovo and make an agreement with the US with regards to Kosovo's mineral wealth. When it should have been allying itself with the US and the EU it chose to defy them and is paying a heavy price. So Serbia's loss of control over Kosovo was simply down to Serbia's stupidity. More fool Serbia!!

So the discussion about building a democracy in Kosovo, generating the rule of law, etc, etc are all propaganda and spin. It's a smokescreen for the general public to justify the invasion of Serbia. Similar to the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Mark my words, many more countries will be ambushed in a similar fashion in the years to come as pressures on resources build inexorably.

"Again and again, I plead to all of us only to be a bit more correct and detached." You should take your own advice, do some independent research instead of listening to Albanian propaganda so that you can state facts and not falsehoods.
 
Ari  Rusila

August 6, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Mrs. Pond,

unfortunately my picture about Kosovo is much more negative than yours.

From administrative point of view Kosovo is total mess-up. EU started its huge rule & law mission late 2008 under UN umbrella. Besides UN/UNMIK and EU/EULEX there is also other players twisting arms who is leading the international protectorate. There is European Union High Representative who simultaneously leads International Community Office wondering his role, same time Nato-troops (KFOR) tries to keep ethnic tensions moderate, OSCE do not know its role nor length of its mission’s mandate in Kosovo, EU delegation office, few influential foreign liaison representatives and of course sc. Kosovo government based to local tribes. It shows amazing creativity to establish this kind organizational nightmare in one tiny province and more amazing is that after nearly nine years of international administration and capacity building and squandered billions of Euros both the administration and the situation on the ground are beneath all criticism.

Multi-ethnic idea is far away despite EU's billions. After bombing almost all Albanian refugees have returned while only tiny fraction of Serb refugees – or officially internally displaced persons – have returned to Kosovo. The remaining Serbs in Kosovo are barricaded into enclaves keeping their lives mainly with help of international KFOR troops or in de facto separated Serb majority region in North Kosovo. This has changed former multi-ethnic province more mono-ethnic one.

According the new report - http://www.minorityrights.org/7860/press-releases/kosovos-independe... -made by Minority Rights Group International (MRG) gives a bare picture about worsening situation of minority rights in today’s Kosovo. Instead to return to their homes after ethnic cleansing implemented by Kosovo Albanians after Nato intervention 1999 and again 2004 minorities are beginning to leave Kosovo, because they face exclusion and discrimination. More about this in my article "...Pogrom with Prize" - http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/kosovo-marchfebruary-17th...

The core problem in Kosovo from my point of view is organized crime. This keeps Kosovo still as tribe society where political parties are only one side of clan activities. As hub of famous Balkan route Kosovo Albanian mafia is distributing majority of heroin sold in western and centre Europe and is now also testing cooperation with Columbian cartels to start distribution more cocaine as well. Earlier (Kosovo) Albanian mafia based its logistics to help of al-Qaida because the heroin is coming from Afghanistan. It is estimated that the value of organized crime for Kosovo is some US 2 bn which btw is up to nearly 40 times bigger than the value of official export from province.

The aim of international community was to build “standards before status”, on 2005 the task was seen impossible so the slogan changed to “standards and status”. Even this was unrealistic so Feb. 2008 “European”standards were thrown away to garbage and “status without standards” precipitately accepted by western powers. For international community I don't see any success story with this backward progress.

The outcome today is a quasi-state with good change to become next “failed” or “captured” state if international community does not firm its grip in province. Today’s Kosovo is already safe-heaven for war criminals, drug traffickers, international money laundry and radical Wahhabists – unfortunately all are also allies of western powers.

Now Europeans realize they were hoodwinked into recognizing Kosovo’s independence on the pretence it would resolve problems and bring peace. Kosovo case was not unique, like it was introduced into playgrounds of international politics, it was a precedent to numerous separatist movement on globe that violence is the right mean to achieve political aims instead of international law.

It’s said that The Balkans are a graveyard for foreign ambitions. This could be the “lessons learned” to both USA and EU. Some more sustainable solutions could also be implemented in Western Balkans. Withdrawal of Kosovo recognition can open real negotiations between local stakeholders with unpredicted but possible compromise can end one frozen conflict.
 
Unregistered User

August 7, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
To all who responded:

Thanks for the kudos, and let me address some of the brickbats, without making my reply longer than my original brief essay.

Recognition of Kosovo by 62 of the 192 UN members is a modest number, but it's above the 50 or so Pristina regarded as critical mass and hoped to win in the first year. As I stated, it's not enough to win the prestige of UN membership for Kosovo any time soon. In practical terms, though, membership in the IMF and World Bank is far more important. It makes Pristina eligible for the economic aid it sorely needs from the international financial institutions. (The EU as such does not recognize Kosovo or any other country, of course; that remains the prerogative of each member state.)

What hinders economic development, far more than the country's diplomatic limbo, is the combination of a low capacity to absorb assistance, rampant corruption, and a global recession that has sharply cut remittances from the Kosovar diaspora.

And yes, it probably will take another decade before Kosovo has achieved the preconditions to be a serious candidate for EU membership. The important thing at this point is to keep the prospect of candidacy alive.

On rule of law, the simplest measure of EULEX's success will be the degree to which it weakens the organized crime and trafficking that plagues Kosovo. This will require court convictions of both Albanians and Serbs. It has long been a cliché that criminals cooperate across ethnic lines far better than governments do.

EULEX will further be measured by its ability to maintain the professional quality of the multiethnic Kosovo Police Service that UNMIK established and to lift the professional level of the cadre of judges and prosecutors. Former KLA fighters did not go into the KPS en masse; they went instead into the Kosovo Protection Corps, a civilian emergency force that is now forming the nucleus (with further individual
screening) of a future Kosovo armed force.

I agree, as I stated in my essay, that Belgrade has been quietly helpful below the public radar in northern Kosovo in beginning to squeeze out some of the political and criminal bosses and in preempting ethnic violence. This does not diminish the role of the Kosovo government in living up to its constitutional promise of respect for minorities, in particular in Serb enclaves south of the Ibar River. Nor does it diminish the specific contribution of the KPS in curbing smuggling and averting violence north of the Ibar. Individual violent confrontations always hit the headlines, but what is most newsworthy is the absence of escalation from these isolated incidents to the gang dust-ups that used to take place on the arena of the Ibar River bridge (or any repetition of the Serb firing of automatic weapons at UN police in north Mitrovica in the early days of independent Kosovo).

I've left various points out, including the flattering of the Kosovar Albanians in seeing them as the inspiration for nationalist movements worldwide. But I would urge anyone who wants to know more of my own views to read my much longer article, "The EU's Test in Kosovo," in the fall 2008 issue of the Washington Quarterly or my chapters on Kosovo and Serbia in my book Endgame in the Balkans (Brookings).
Tags: | Kosovo | EU membership | West Balkan |
 
Nikolina-Romana  Milunovic

August 7, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

Thanks for your comments.

Atlantic-community.org is a platform for serious and thoughtful debate for people from around the world and all walks of life, who are not afraid to be associated with the opinions they express on the internet.

In fact, we believe that commenters are taken more seriously, if they reveal their real identity rather than use a nickname.

Therefore I have to ask you to please identify yourself, when you comment here. Otherwise I will have to delete your comment no matter how good and legitimate your statements are.

In fact, it would be best, if you would register for free and fill out the personal profile.

This would also enable you to network with our more than 3000 members. And it would also save you time commenting, since registered members (who are logged in) do not need to type those captchas. If you have already registered, but forgot your password, you can get a new one.
Moreover, please refrain from insulting statements and aim to focus on the issues and not on the authors, even when they attack you or when you mean it all in good humor. This will not only maintain a friendly tone in these debates, it will make your arguments more effective.

If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact the atlantic-community.org staff.

Thank you!
 
Unregistered User

August 8, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
This piece is one of many articles I've read by types who haunt EU ministries and universities who, having spent time in Pristina's municipal offices and international dining halls, have convinced themselves that in the aggregate Kosovo is a state that actively respects human rights. My personal experience is far from that. Grand pronouncements of media-savvy ministers aside, Kosovo is a place where minorities live at their peril to this day. It is a disgrace to Europe, and a disgrace to the countries that have supported Kosovo with financial, political and professional capital nigh on a decade.

I'm surprised how little mention I see of of the actual - as opposed to theoretical - state of human rights in Kosovo. The consensus seems to be that they are fully respected, or are at least a non-issue. I'm reminded of the Soviets' solemn vows that the USSR represented a pure democracy and millennial fulfillment of human rights and human potential. See... just saying that it's so doesn't make it so.

I spent most of the period 1996-2006 working in former Yugoslavia, and visited Kosovo frequently over those years. From my experience on the ground, minorities in Kosovo continue to live in danger and fear to this day. An unofficial policy of socially enforced, and politically tolerated, soft apartheid is the norm in minority areas.

As an example, I visited Kosovo as a tourist in August, 2006. I was detained and harassed by Albanian border officials and police because of my Slavic name. My (US) passport and documents were taken from me and I was interrogated, at length, so that they could determine whether or not I am of Serbian origin. (Is this standard in Berlin, Ms. Pond?)

I'm a native English speaker, born in the US, and was traveling with a US passport and diplomatic credentials. My wife, who is Irish-American and kept her maiden name, was not asked about her ethnic background. Why? My wife and I had to ask: if I was treated this way, what is life like for the average Kosovo minority who lacks the protection of a foreign passport and affiliations?

Over the years, I've spent countless hours working in refugee centers that housed expelled Kosovo minorities, driben out under the watch of NATO and Kosovo's ostensible civil authority. I saw row upon row of burned minority homes in Kosovo. I saw enclaves in Kosovo, surrounded by barbed wire and protective NATO troops - ethnic ghettoes of the 21st century. I walked into ancient monasteries surrounded by enormous tanks and armored equipment to protect them from assault.

I'm completely in favor of respecting human rights. But reading this article and the strangely antiseptic/academic responses to it, it strikes me that there are two Kosovos: the theoretical, democratic Kosovo that European technocrats pronounce from their ivory towers as genuinely committed to European democratic standards; and the real Kosovo, which one is welcome to visit only with the right name and ethnic background.
 
Unregistered User

September 3, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
There is a simple task:

Do a journey by car, that is euqipped with Serbian license plates "KM" (Kosovska Mitrovica) and cross Kosovo from Leposavic to Dragash and from Gjilan to Pec/Peja.

 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Felix  Oldenburg
Felix Oldenburg
Member since
May 22, 2007

Poll


DW-WORLD.DE


Europe
Europe
Germany




DW-TV Live DW-Radio Live