As nations become increasingly strategic
about managing their global reputations, policy makers and national leaders are
faced with a growing set of variables through which their country "brand" is
measured and evaluated.
The emergent global interest in policies
addressing climate change and fostering investment in new clean technology
(cleantech) industries presents a compelling system
around which country reputations can be measured.
Earlier this year, my firm led an effort to
solicit feedback from policy makers, investors, and international communications
experts to establish a system for evaluating national green reputations and
ranking countries within them.
Through surveys, follow-up questions, small
focus groups, and secondary research, this project produced the 1st Global Green Economy Index which is being released this week.
This
report focuses on four areas which makeup a country's green
reputation:
- International Leadership: To what extent are nations associated with green leadership on the international stage?
- Clean Energy Technology Investment: From the perspective of a clean energy technology investment fund, which country presents the best investment target over the next ten years?
- Domestic Policy Incentives: Which country has the most effective domestic policies in place to foster the development of clean energy technologies?
- Tourism: Which country shows the strongest commitment to promoting green tourism?
Our
results were both illuminating and surprising. A bloc of Northern European
nations led by Germany,
Denmark, and
Sweden enjoy significant recognition
for their international green leadership. These countries also stand out for
having the right policies in place to foster the development of clean energy
technologies. Survey respondents strongly valued the strength of these national
policies in selecting country leaders.
Despite their large share of global greenhouse gas emissions, our
survey showed that a majority of respondents perceived that the
United States and China
are actually under recognized for their green leadership. China also topped the list as the best investment
target for a cleantech venture fund over the next
year, followed by other large economies like the United States, Brazil and India.
New
Zealand dominated our survey as the undisputed
leader at promoting green tourism within its borders.
But
do green reputations, positive or negative, really influence politics and
investment decisions? We believe that they do.
Voters in elections throughout Europe have expressed interest in their leaders' role in
international climate diplomacy and supporting the growth of clean energy
markets domestically. These politicians benefit from successfully communicating
their green merits to national constituents, as well as internationally.
The
governments of Germany,
Denmark, and Sweden
should continue to cement their positions as green leaders on the international
stage. The early leadership of these nations and the perceived success of their
policies to date could increase their international clout as climate and cleantech issues grow in importance.
The
investment community benefits from clear communication with public and
private actors, who provide certainty about the scope of investment opportunities
in their countries as well as the surrounding legal, regulatory and tax regimes that support them. Government efforts to form cleantech clusters in
Finland and elsewhere are one
successful strategy for focusing external capital and communications about
investment targets and procedures under one roof.
Other
nations, like Israel and
South
Korea, were judged to have missed an
opportunity to clearly communicate the vitality of their green activities. Nations in this category have the most to
gain from strategically communicating their green merits internationally in the
next five years.
To
read the 1st Global Green Economy Index, please click
here:
http://www.dualcitizeninc.com/ggei2010.pdf
Jeremy Tamanini is the founder of Dual Citizen Inc., a consultancy working with governments and international organizations on creative strategies to advance their policy and economic agendas.



September 29, 2010
Erica Mukherjee, NYU, Silver Contributor (51)
The best way to combat faddism is to make sure that the green movement pays, not only in intangible environmental benefits but also in immediate economic benefits. That is why the second question on the Dual Citizen report is the most important.
What countries hold the best opportunities for green investment? What industries can most benefit from implementing green technology? What is the risk assessment of investing in green technology? What specific green measures have the greatest rate of return?
Maximize the economic returns of going green and the green revolution has the potential to change the course of humankind as much as the industrial revolution did.