Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

March 21, 2008 |  1 comment |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Frederik C. Köncke

Multinationals Face Political and Economic Risks

Frederik C. Köncke: In an increasingly complex global environment, businesses are seeking a greater understanding of how they are at risk.

 


Each year Aon Trade Credit ranks the political and economic risk of 209 countries and territories, measuring risk of currency inconvertibility and transfer; strikes, riots and civil commotion; war; terrorism; sovereign non-payment; political interference; supply chain interruption; legal and regulatory risk. The risk in each country was ranked as Low, Medium-Low, Medium, Medium-High or High. A country with an "elevated" risk is defined as any country with a risk ranked at Medium-Low, Medium, Medium-High or High. The results of the analysis are detailed on the 2008 Political & Economic Risk Map, produced by Aon in partnership with Oxford Analytica, an international consulting firm. Oxford Analytica draws its analysis from a global network of more than 1,000 experts to make independent judgments about geopolitical risk.

According to the 2008 Political and Economic Risk Map, multinational organizations in 25 of the 50 largest global economies face elevated political and economic risks - including risks of business interruption caused by war, terror attacks, and political interference.

Some of the countries highlighted are those nations whose economies are among the fastest growing ones. Yet, even some of the wealthiest nations are under risk.

Thus, terrorism threat remains a factor in the UK in light of last year's attempted car bombings in London and Glasgow, while the country has been placed on "Credit Risk Negative Watch" due to its exposure to the sub-prime credit crunch.

Overall, amongst the top 50 economies, the analysis found political and economic risk is at its highest in the oil-rich nations of Iran, Nigeria, and Venezuela, where businesses face civil unrest, war, terrorism, and nonpayment by governments for services rendered. For example, companies doing business in Russia face an increased degree of state control in the natural resources sector. Additionally, the global risk management community is increasingly concerned about supply chain risks in Asia.

The Global Credit Crunch

Aon has also introduced a new feature to their Risk Map, the Global Credit Crunch Index, which measures emerging markets' exposure to international financial turmoil. The index lists 25 nations for which exposure to the global credit crunch is other than Low. It finds that particularly the newer entrants to the global economy, such as Turkey, Hungary, and Romania, are more likely to be impacted by a global credit crunch.

However, while political and economic risks to companies doing business in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom remain comparatively low, companies doing business in those countries are potentially more vulnerable to business interruption due to terror attacks than those doing business in Japan, the world's second largest economy.

The complete map can be downloaded as a PDF. Also see the press release in English and German.

To request your own copy of the map, please complete the form. Oxford Analytica, an international consulting firm, draws its analysis from a global network of more than 1,000 experts - including senior faculty members at Oxford University and at major research institutions worldwide - to make independent judgments about geopolitical risk.

Fredrik Köncke is the head of Aon Crisis Management Germany. Headquartered in Chicago, Aon Corporation is a leading provider of risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, human capital and management consulting, and specialty insurance underwriting.

Related material from the Atlantic Community:
  • 6
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
ilyas m mohsin

April 6, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Aon Corporations indicators appear to be pretty reliable. The above account gives a comprehensive picture of the situation faced by Multinationals all over due to the prevailing mess.
On an objective level, it appears to be the outcome of a uni-polar world wherein the US neocons won 2 terms for their President by waging costly wars. This has resulted in general destablization and massive devastation in the'occupied' countries. It has led to undermining of US laws as well major International protocols.
while US economy is crumbling fast, the peace in the world is going down with it. those who can't fight back with equal resources resort to terrorism. this is the lesson since the start of the 20th century. As millions have been killed, the threat from the aggrieved party remains
substantial. While nobody can condone terrorism wherein mainly non-combatants suffer, including business interests, it seem unavoidable in view of the misadventures undertaken by the US in the last 7 years.
Unfortunately the second-stringers in development would suffer much more. However, that is what the current Global Economic set up is all about.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Fabian Martin Lieschke
Fabian Martin Lieschke
Member since
June 17, 2008

Poll