Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

March 21, 2011 |  3 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Jesse  Schwartz

Unintended Consequences

Jesse Schwartz: Mohamed Bouazizi, driven to commit suicide by the despair of his circumstances, has galvanized millions while simultaneously unleashing a torrent of repressed anger. The social and political fabric of the greater Middle East has been irrevocably altered as a result.

Every century or so, a vast swelling of human emotion, intellect and spirit coalesces under the auspices of liberty, engendering an epochal transformation that sends shock waves forever reverberating through the sands of time. Recent history has stood witness to The Glorious Revolution, The Spirit of '76, The Spring of Nations, the litany of independence movements in the 19th and 20th centuries, and now, the Arab Revolutions of 2011.

Over the last few decades, fear and quiescence - the pathology of tyranny - have become a hallmark trait of citizens in the security states that constitute much of the greater Middle East. The Arab Revolts have been a long time coming. The event that precipitated them, however, was as shocking and unforeseeable as its ultimate outcome - the ouster of two autocrats by relatively non-violent, secular movements, with several other dictators facing the prospect of widespread insurrection.

On December 17, 2010, Mohamed Bouazizi, a twenty-six-year-old Tunisian street vendor, committed one of the most brazen acts of which a human is capable, self-immolation.

Mohamed Bouazizi's father died when he was three years old. By the age of ten, he was the primary provider for the Bouazizi family, walking two kilometers to the supermarket to buy fresh fruit and vegetables to sell at the local market in Sidi Bouzid, his hometown of forty thousand. Upon turning eighteen, Mohamed quit school to work fulltime; he hoped to give his five younger siblings the opportunities that he had never had. Mohamed, as it turns out, was successful in that respect - his meager earnings, roughly $140 per month, supported a younger sister's college tuition. The heartfelt story ends there.

Tunisia, under the rule of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali and the extended family of his second wife, a former hairdresser, had become a nation rife with nepotism, unbridled corruption, and ostentatious displays of wealth among a small coterie of haves.

Beginning from the time Bouazizi was just a boy, he suffered the daily humiliation and ignominy - at the hands of a venal and disreputable ruling regime - that is so prevalent throughout the region. Police officers often bullied or fined him for operating without a permit, which costs more in bribe tributes than he could earn in a day. Never mind that a permit is not required to sell from a cart in Sidi Bouzid, it still wasn't uncommon for the police to confiscate Bouazizi's produce and scales, the lifeline of his work.

On December 16, 2010, Mohamed made his customary trek to the supermarket (he aspired to save enough money to buy a pickup truck one day). He procured his goods on credit and returned home at 10 p.m. His mother said that he didn't sleep much due to the stresses of his work.

He left the next morning at 8 a.m. A policewoman confronted him on the way to the market. She returned soon thereafter and tried to take his scale from him. He didn't have a license. Bouazizi refused to relinquish the scale, though. Swearing ensued, then the policewoman slapped Mohamed in the face, allegedly insulted his deceased father and, with the help of her colleagues, forced him to the ground. The officers knocked over his cart and confiscated his scale, valued at $100, or the equivalent of twenty days' work for Mohamed. Publicly humiliated, Bouazizi sought recourse. He went to the local municipality building and demanded his scale back. He was told it wouldn't be possible to talk to the official who made such decisions.

Thus was the rampant level of graft and extortion prevailing that a, by all accounts, hardworking, optimistic and generous young man was driven to douse himself in gasoline and light a match. Standing in front of the municipality building, Bouazizi's last words were, "How do you expect me to make a living?"

What is so striking about Mohamed Bouazizi's martyrdom is that, ostensibly, he had no intention of becoming a martyr. His suicide was not political or religious in its nature, nor was it premeditated. His life outside of his loving family was the personification of frustration, and his death: the paramount expression of hopelessness. At the core, that's a sentiment that resonates with every human - and certainly with the countless others who have suffered similar injustice throughout the Middle East.

The social, religious, and economic environments across North Africa and the Middle East are disparate, to say the least. Yet the least common denominator, an innate mark of the human condition - disgust and indignation provoked by existential subjugation  - can be felt from Algiers to Sana'a and from Amman to Manama. As a local Sidi Bouzid union leader put it: "The fear had begun to melt away and we were a volcano that was going to explode. And when Bouazizi burnt himself, we were ready."

The sudden nature by which the revolutions rose and spread across diverse Arab communities speaks to this endemic phenomenon. Yes, it is true that "a new generation with knowledge of the world beyond came into its own," as Johns Hopkins Professor Fouad Ajami wrote in the New York Times. And there is no doubt that Facebook and Twitter have enabled and facilitated every step of the way. But, more than any other factor, the revolts were borne out of a cathartic release; the volcano exploded, and the reign of impunity is now coming to an end.

Yet without Mohamed Bouazizi's incredible sacrifice, the currents sweeping the Middle East may have never taken on the universal dynamic currently manifested, and eviscerated civil societies would have likely never found such a collective voice. Now, thanks to the anguished actions of one who inspired many, we citizens of the 21st century stand witness as the vestiges of an antiquated and pernicious political system crumble beneath the powerful force of the human spirit. 

Jesse Schwartz has recently earned his graduate degree from The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University.

  • 8
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | Bouazizi | revolution | Uprising | Tunisia | Arab world |
 
Comments
Bernhard  Lucke

March 21, 2011

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thank you for this article, which alerts us of the small things happening in people's everyday life.

This is were progress has to start, and only if tackling this level, aid or interventions from abroad can be successful. Unfortunately, despite the best intentions, western activity has all to often only triggered more corruption. Perhaps simply because we never dealt directly with people such as Mohammed Bouazizi.
 
Sascha  Lohmann

March 21, 2011

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Great, well-written article that highlights the tremendous importance of human agency in bringing about real political change. It reminds me of Richard Lebow's book 'Theory of International Relations' that seeks to build a theory of international relations based on exactly this human spirtit, complemented by appetite and reason and therefore challenging conventional theories of balance-of-power politics or institutionalism.

Against this backdrop, it is highly questionable whether foreign interventions, be it military action or foreign aid, can effectively contribute to the process of change within a country. The intervention in Libya once again raises serious doubts about the effects of such good intentions put forward by the West.

Imposing no-drive-zones from above will only help in the short-term. But there seems to be no strategy for what comes after. As Bernhard suggested above, Europe and the United States need to deal directly with the peoples and not with their suppressors. The unfolding revolutions all over the Arab world clearly show that there are many courageous individuals who seem to be more than ready to transform the political landscape of the 21st century for the benefit of the human spirit.
 
Jesse  Schwartz

March 24, 2011

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Sascha and Bernhard, thank you for your insightful feedback. As you know, the international aid community often struggles to come to grips with the paradox of intentions vs outcomes. I'd be curious to hear more about how you envision an efficacious approach to bottom-up empowerment.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?