Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

January 12, 2012 |  3 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Yemen's Year-Long Spring

Alexandra Lewis: Yemen was hit hard by the Arab Spring, which has a cross-national appeal that has somewhat obscured its distinctiveness in each country. Demonstrations in Yemen are strongly correlated with long-standing grievances on security and development, yet protests have become entwined with existing power struggles and difficult to disentangle from local conflicts.

The Arab Spring left virtually no country in the Middle East and North Africa untouched by mass protests. It arrived in Yemen on January 27, 2011, when thousands of demonstrators took to the streets, demanding a change of leadership, whereby the removal of President Saleh as the head of the Yemeni government was a central and non-negotiable theme. Such removal, pro-change protesters demanded, needed to be immediate. While President Saleh is generally acknowledged to have been consistently democratically elected within the country, this demand for his immediate resignation stemmed not only from a popular desire for political change, but also from a consistent loss of faith in the Yemeni democratic system, accentuated by a history of unrepresentative politics, allegations of multi-level corruption, and growing public suspicions that the President would institute a policy of hereditary rule in light of his ailing health, passing leadership of the country down to his son.

The issue of President Saleh's immediate departure, however, proved extremely contentious, with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and Qatar especially, striving to broker a deal for a phased transfer of power. Though the deal has now been signed, President Saleh has been reluctant to leave office entirely, his family retains important control over governmental and military structures and he and key members of the Yemeni Government have been granted immunity from prosecution in the International Criminal Court, despite the use of hugely oppressive tactics to disband and punish protesters. The agreement itself has therefore lacked severely in legitimacy for a number of reasons, including that the deal has been negotiated between the Yemeni state and the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP), who are not considered to be representative of the majority of demonstrators.

The Arab Spring began in Yemen as a youth movement, with university students and graduates playing a central role in organizing and mobilizing protesters. However, they were soon joined by various other factions as demonstrations gained in momentum. In particular, the Arab Spring represented the opportunity for various actors who had been in conflict with the Government for the past decade to advance their own individual agendas. In the far North of Yemen, insecurity generated by protests across the country offered the chance for the Houthi rebel movement to reorganize and secure an operational stronghold, establishing a virtually self-contained and separate governance system in the Sa'ada area that may have begun to spread its influence into neighboring governorates. Likewise, the Arab Spring and its explicit call for a change of leadership and therefore a change in the structures of government also reinvigorated the Southern Separatist Movement, who have used protests to vocalize their own grievances. At the same time, the diversion of security forces towards containing public demonstrations has led to the escalation of Al Qaeda's activities in the country, with rumors of AQAP seizing control of important cities and strongholds in the South.

From April of 2011 onwards, the Arab Spring in Yemen began to take on a notably different character, as high ranking members of the existing political system began to adopt more overtly anti-Government stances along with popular protesters. In particular, the JMP, with Islah and the Yemeni Socialist Party as two of its foundational sub-structures, began increasingly to appoint themselves as the official spokesmen for the pro-change movement, despite the clear cultural, religious and ideological divisions between different groups that had joined in demonstrations. The JMP's critics, have sighted the group’s strong financial and political ties to the existing leadership as a cause for major concern, though the party have nevertheless been treated as the voice of the Arab Spring in negotiations organized by the GCC. Some of these political connections have been severed through the mass resignation of JMP officials from the Yemeni Government out of protest against the state's use of military violence against demonstrators in 2011. However, personal and financial connections remain for many of the JMP's members. Cynical observers of the situation might conclude that the JMP's actions of late indicate, if anything, only a last bit attempt to distance themselves from a collapsing state in order to ensure their own survival. Regardless of their motivations, a recent deal brokered by the GCC has ensured the JMP’s continued involvement in Yemeni politics.

Similar concerns have been voiced about some of Saleh's previous supporters, who have included powerful tribal leaders and military stakeholders. Chief among these have been the Al-Ahmar Family (heads of the Hashid tribal federation)and General Ali Al Mohsen, who defected from the military along with several of his units in March of 2011, allegedly to protect protesters from state violence. The Hashid and Bakil Federations have previously acted as a major support structure for the Yemeni state and have therefore maintained a vested interest in the state's survival. These allegiances, supported by financial stipends, function to all effects and purposes as a shadow state, which has been a central motivating factor of general unrest in Yemen for several years, as well as a thematic element of the early 2011 protests. It is a system that various tribal groupings are said to have a direct vested interest in maintaining. Yet in May of 2011, the al-Ahmar family, headed by Sheik Sadiq al-Ahmar, openly ended its alliance with President Saleh, representing a break of the Hashid Federation from the government for reasons that are largely unknown. In June, the Government of Yemen began a direct military campaign against the al-Ahmar family in Sana'a, sparking what historians might refer to as a second Yemeni civil war.

Of primary concern here is that the struggle between these elite stakeholders has overshadowed the youth movement that began the Arab Spring in Yemen, leading to the strong possibility that their grievances will once again be overlooked in any negotiated peace settlements in the country. Of further concern here, however, is the issue that little media attention has been paid to Yemen’s year long spring in light of similar events in Egypt, Lybia and Syria. This has meant that the protests in Yemen have been read by the media largely as the product of a bursting of the flood gates in Tunisia, rather than as a new manifestation of old conflicts, which may not be resolved by the simple removal of one man from a seat of highly contested and questionable power.

Alexandra Lewis is a researcher and doctoral student at the Post-War Reconstruction and Development Unit of the University of York, where her focus is on violent young offending in Yemen.

  • 8
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | Arab League | Saleh | Arab Spring | Yemen |
 
Comments
Talha Bin  Tariq

January 12, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Yemen's cabinet proposed the immunity law for Saleh on Sunday to encourage him to step down under a Gulf-brokered plan to end protests that have paralyzed the country over the past year.

Yemeni prime minister Mohammed Basindwa visited Saudi Arabia on Tuesday and is scheduled to meet other Gulf Arab leaders this week to discuss the transition of power in a country that has become a base for a branch of al Qaeda.
 
Eva  Maria Krockow

January 16, 2012

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Ms Lewis,
Thank you for this very comprehensive analysis of the situation in Yemen. Since I am no regional expert, may I ask your opinion on the best solution to the ongoing protests in Yemen in order to ensure to peace and democracy within the state? Against the background of Yemen's lack of unity, do you think a change of government would be beneficial with regards to long-term stability? Considering the case of Syria, for example, Assad's fall might lead to the prosecution of previously protected religious minority groups or even civil war. Do you think a change of regime and the removal of Saleh, who previously enjoyed fairly broad popular support, could also hold the possibility of the state's disintegration or aggravated internal conflicts?
 
Alexandra  Lewis

January 17, 2012

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Eva Maria Krockow,

That is a very difficult question indeed, and it is, of course, always much easier to determine what is wrong with a scenario than how to fix it. I can only give you my opinion on this subject - and I would emphasise that history may prove my predictions wrong. I would say this: Yemen is a country facing prolonged and entrenched underdevelopment. In effect, I believe that the government that emerged after the unification of the country in 1990 began its rule from a position of significant weakness, with substantial challenges ahead of it. The Yemeni people had long since romanticised the idea of unification, which was meant to bring about a change in their development situation. With limited resources and institutional capacity, President Saleh's government was unable to bring about this promised golden age in Yemen's development. Added to this Yemen's high levels of institutional corruption, local frustrations began to build up almost since the very beginning. These frustrations have manifested themselves in a war for separatism, six wars in the North since 2005, a separatist movement, support for terrorist organisations, and most recently the Arab Spring. While the removal of President Saleh is a central theme of current demonstrations, much like the unification of Yemen in the first instance - this event is unlikely to bring about change on the level that the Yemeni people now demand. For one thing, removing the figurehead will not necessarily lead to a change in the political system, or the removal of patronage networks. For another, any leader that takes over in Yemen after Saleh will face considerable demands to bring about a demonstrable improvement in living conditions in the country. A failure to bring about such a change will likely re-ignite the violence once again.

In the short-term: President Saleh's removal would likely help the country to avoid a civil war in 2012. However, in the long-term, this in itself will not be sufficient to permanently reduce overall levels of violence in the country. In order to avoid this worst case scenario, any emerging government needs to ensure that the youth movements that launched the Arab Spring in Yemen are effectively integrated into the mainstream political process, along with under-represented minorities and oppositional political movements. On a basic level, the state needs to restore an effective relationship with young people and create an open forum through which they can express their concerns for the future of the country.

Sincerely,

Alexandra Lewis.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?