Bobo Lo's "Axis of Convenience" examines
the relationship between Russia
and China
and offers a fresh and grounded perspective on a much misunderstood
partnership.
Lo is a seasoned expert in Russia and China. As the Head of the Centre for European Reform's Russia and China programs and previously a Visiting Scholar at the Carnegie Moscow Centre, he is well placed to respond to the spate of anxiety
which the Sino-Russian partnership has provoked among Western observers. The
two countries have found favor in one another over recent years, working
together over Iran, North Korea and nuclear defense, and providing a stark
contrast to decades, if not centuries, of hostility.
This is an immensely timely publication
which has important implications for how we understand the power struggles
currently taking place on the global stage. The book confidently pulls the
reins in on raging rhetoric of new world orders and the decline of the US. Lo
considers "multipolarity" to be a long way off, and depicts the Chinese-Russian
partnership as both limited and entirely non-ideological. As such, it offers a sobering
analysis of the impact of this relationship on the West.
Whilst Lo acknowledges the important change
which the Iraq War has had on the perception of the US
globally, he considers the "new geopolitics" to be based on fluid,
non-committal relationships in the context of which the US remains the
clear global leader. Among the most important points that the author puts
forward is that the Sino-Russian partnership is quite firmly of secondary
importance to each country's interaction with their respective Western
neighbors: Russia with the
EU, China with the US. China,
says Lo, would choose the US
over Russia
if pushed. Whilst such an assertion is by nature somewhat speculative, the fact
that trade and economic ties between
Russia and China are a fraction of ties with the EU and US is a good
indicator of its likelihood.
Crucially, there are important factors preventing
this partnership from expanding beyond a limited and convenient one. The most
overwhelming one is what Lo terms the "asymmetry" of the relationship: whilst Russia
appeared to be on the ascendant in the early 1990s, Beijing's pre-eminence is now becoming
startlingly clear. There also exist key areas of contention: competition over
influence in Central Asia, uncertainty over
the future of the Russian Far East and Russian fears about Chinese military and
demographic capacities. This partnership, then, is one of superficial
opportunism which for the sake of convenience overlooks underlying competition.
Lo also provides a good dose of Cold War
history, outlining the long-standing mistrust and divergent ambitions which
define both countries and ultimately make a partnership based on ideology
impossible. The partnership which they have recently engaged in goes little way
in undermining the fundamentally divergent approaches and mentalities which
have given rise to centuries of bitter rivalry.
The prognosis for the next ten years is
clear for Lo. This partnership will persist as a limited and ambivalent one. In particular, the focus of both Russia and China
on their Western allies will remain their primary one: Russia needs to maintain good relationships with
the EU to secure its ambitions to become a "bridge" or "third pole," and China will not
risk upsetting the Americans in pursuit of its role as a constructive
international actor who is everybody's friend.
Lo's writing is engaging and accessible,
and provides a cool-headed critique of the folly of melodramatic terms in
understanding international relations. The book was written before the
financial crisis had really hit, so Lo's dismissal of multipolarity theories
must be tempered with the huge changes which are currently being orchestrated
in how to organize the globalized economy. Nonetheless, "Axis of Convenience"
offers insight into a relationship which has been all too easily misrepresented
in a climate of new-world-order hysteria. Lo urges his reader to see this
relationship, as opportunistic, tactical and void of ideology as it is, as a
force for good in a world which can only benefit from the stabilization of explosive
geopolitical issues. It is a book which provides a much-needed moment of pause
in the current whirlwind of speculation and suspicion of the world's lesser
understood political actors.

Buy at Amazon.com or Amazon.de
Eimear O'Casey is currently an intern with Atlantic Community.




April 4, 2009
Member deleted
Now would that be the Arctic Ice or the polar caps? Would that be those inponderables of balance and values, etc.? The mistakes of the old and the jeerings of other things of the past? Of getting certain pictures more correctly as the clouds move and lightening flashes and thunder rolls: of fairy tales and realities. Or of certain things that are always silent as far as the human language is concerend and yet much more articulate and much more eloquent - in those silences? Who knows why, but history and PB Shelley with his Ozymandias! Prose, poetry, history and the great silences! Pax Vobiscum said the great silences without playing the arbitrator of world politics.
But yes, Lo has got a bo hold on certain issues. The silences - they are pregnant with stories and folklores. World politics and history: with certain realizations and calculations devoid of cold mechanical sciences or what has been termed as the violence of the physicality of the physical sciences! The notion of partnership-of-equals shows a certain respect and awareness, everything remaining the same, and one smiles. Lo Behold, one suddenly wants to read Bbo Lo's book - without the role of playing any arbritrator in world politics. But in the silence of stories and their beauties - as the skies and the cosmos plays it out!