Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

February 4, 2009 |  1 comment |  Print | E-Mail Book Reviews  

Topic Bobo Lo: Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing and the New Geopolitics

Eimear O'Casey:

Bobo Lo's "Axis of Convenience" examines the relationship between Russia and China and offers a fresh and grounded perspective on a much misunderstood partnership.

Lo is a seasoned expert in Russia and China. As the Head of the Centre for European Reform's Russia and China programs and previously a Visiting Scholar at the Carnegie Moscow Centre, he is well placed to respond to the spate of anxiety which the Sino-Russian partnership has provoked among Western observers. The two countries have found favor in one another over recent years, working together over Iran, North Korea and nuclear defense, and providing a stark contrast to decades, if not centuries, of hostility.

This is an immensely timely publication which has important implications for how we understand the power struggles currently taking place on the global stage. The book confidently pulls the reins in on raging rhetoric of new world orders and the decline of the US. Lo considers "multipolarity" to be a long way off, and depicts the Chinese-Russian partnership as both limited and entirely non-ideological. As such, it offers a sobering analysis of the impact of this relationship on the West.

Whilst Lo acknowledges the important change which the Iraq War has had on the perception of the US globally, he considers the "new geopolitics" to be based on fluid, non-committal relationships in the context of which the US remains the clear global leader. Among the most important points that the author puts forward is that the Sino-Russian partnership is quite firmly of secondary importance to each country's interaction with their respective Western neighbors: Russia with the EU, China with the US. China, says Lo, would choose the US over Russia if pushed. Whilst such an assertion is by nature somewhat speculative, the fact that trade and economic ties between Russia and China are a fraction of ties with the EU and US is a good indicator of its likelihood.

Crucially, there are important factors preventing this partnership from expanding beyond a limited and convenient one. The most overwhelming one is what Lo terms the "asymmetry" of the relationship: whilst Russia appeared to be on the ascendant in the early 1990s, Beijing's pre-eminence is now becoming startlingly clear. There also exist key areas of contention: competition over influence in Central Asia, uncertainty over the future of the Russian Far East and Russian fears about Chinese military and demographic capacities. This partnership, then, is one of superficial opportunism which for the sake of convenience overlooks underlying competition.

Lo also provides a good dose of Cold War history, outlining the long-standing mistrust and divergent ambitions which define both countries and ultimately make a partnership based on ideology impossible. The partnership which they have recently engaged in goes little way in undermining the fundamentally divergent approaches and mentalities which have given rise to centuries of bitter rivalry.

The prognosis for the next ten years is clear for Lo. This partnership will persist as a limited and ambivalent one. In particular, the focus of both Russia and China on their Western allies will remain their primary one: Russia needs to maintain good relationships with the EU to secure its ambitions to become a "bridge" or "third pole," and China will not risk upsetting the Americans in pursuit of its role as a constructive international actor who is everybody's friend.

Lo's writing is engaging and accessible, and provides a cool-headed critique of the folly of melodramatic terms in understanding international relations. The book was written before the financial crisis had really hit, so Lo's dismissal of multipolarity theories must be tempered with the huge changes which are currently being orchestrated in how to organize the globalized economy. Nonetheless, "Axis of Convenience" offers insight into a relationship which has been all too easily misrepresented in a climate of new-world-order hysteria. Lo urges his reader to see this relationship, as opportunistic, tactical and void of ideology as it is, as a force for good in a world which can only benefit from the stabilization of explosive geopolitical issues. It is a book which provides a much-needed moment of pause in the current whirlwind of speculation and suspicion of the world's lesser understood political actors.

 

Axis-Convenience-Moscow-Beijing-Geopolitics

Buy at Amazon.com or Amazon.de

Eimear O'Casey is currently an intern with Atlantic Community.

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Member deleted

April 4, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Once there was a piece of cake that two cats found. They exchanges were beginning to descend into a quarrel, when a monkey happened to pass by. So he did a quick Pax Vobiscum and asked for the reasons for such loud feline disagreements. Cats usually were very discreet about their differences, when in public. So the issue arose over who gets the cake. The monkey was wise and said another Pax Vobiscum and spake of equality. So the cats agreed to an arbitration and the monkey made two pieces of the cake and began weighing it on a scale. A tiny bite there and a tiny bite here to equal the scales: lo behold, a gradually shrinking size of the cakes and a pair of befuddled cats! A polite burp and another pax vobiscum and the monkey was off!
Now would that be the Arctic Ice or the polar caps? Would that be those inponderables of balance and values, etc.? The mistakes of the old and the jeerings of other things of the past? Of getting certain pictures more correctly as the clouds move and lightening flashes and thunder rolls: of fairy tales and realities. Or of certain things that are always silent as far as the human language is concerend and yet much more articulate and much more eloquent - in those silences? Who knows why, but history and PB Shelley with his Ozymandias! Prose, poetry, history and the great silences! Pax Vobiscum said the great silences without playing the arbitrator of world politics.
But yes, Lo has got a bo hold on certain issues. The silences - they are pregnant with stories and folklores. World politics and history: with certain realizations and calculations devoid of cold mechanical sciences or what has been termed as the violence of the physicality of the physical sciences! The notion of partnership-of-equals shows a certain respect and awareness, everything remaining the same, and one smiles. Lo Behold, one suddenly wants to read Bbo Lo's book - without the role of playing any arbritrator in world politics. But in the silence of stories and their beauties - as the skies and the cosmos plays it out!
Tags: | philosophy | history | morals |
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Lydia  Karga
Lydia Karga
Member since
February 6, 2011

Poll