June 10, 2008 |  5 comments |  Print this Article | E-Mail Your Opinion  

C. Deblock & M. Rioux

Canada and the EU: From Transatlantic Economic Dialogue to Monologue

C. Deblock & M. Rioux: Canadians want to develop closer economic ties with Europe in order to reduce their dependence on the United States. However this new “European” policy is motivated by the wrong reasons and political and structural differences could prove insurmountable.

Once again, Canada is making another attempt to revive and improve economic and political ties with Europe. This recurrent theme on the transatlantic front reminds one of someone pushing on a replay button frantically in an attempt to trigger some new dynamics without ever really succeeding. Canada enjoys good relations with the EU, but Canada, unlike the United States, is not a priority for the EU. While new initiatives have been launched to reset the transatlantic economic dialogue, one can wonder whether the interest and the political will, on the European side, are really there. Numerous reasons explain why Canada seeks to secure and revitalize its relationship with the EU, but the most important one is that Canada is looking for a solution to a stalling and slowing North American economic integration.

Indeed, since NAFTA, Canada's international economic policy has been centered on renewing and deepening economic integration with the United States. Yet, the benefits of North American integration for Canada are less evident now than they were in the late 1990s. Canada is looking for new options. One of which is to build on NAFTA and The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, and to deepen economic integration with United States. Some have proposed a customs union, others the setting-up of a bilateral commission to harmonize market regulations, norms and standards, but even if this were achieved, it would not help Canada face the challenges of the new geo-economic order and improve its international competitiveness.

Increasingly, Canada is an exporter of energy and raw materials; its huge surplus with the United States is in fact mainly tied to this sector. With an overvalued dollar and a poor productivity growth, manufacture exports face hard competition on American markets, while Asian imports have exploded. Canada has a trade deficit in goods with almost all countries except the United States, and its surplus with its neighbor masks important industrial adjustment and competitiveness problems. Thanks to NAFTA, and natural resources, Canada's economic performance is still rather good, but it needs to boost its economy, reconsider its international economic policy, and adapt to the new world economic geography, just as Canadian enterprises are trying to do.

Multilateralism being on hold while Canada's bilateral ties with BRICs, and Asia, developing slowly, Canada finds nowhere else to turn to than Europe in its latest attempt to gain autonomy from the United States and to look for a new engine for growth, competitiveness and prosperity. Trade relations are developing as Canadian firms are everyday more active in Europe - commercial services are showing interesting prospects, etc. - but the fact is: the United States is a much bigger economic player than Canada and the prime transatlantic interlocutor for the EU. Moreover, the EU is too busy building Europe and developing its own trade and investment cooperation partnerships to pay real attention to a dialogue with Canada. At last, harmonizing market standards and regulations, a Canadian objective, could be an insurmountable task as North American and European systems are so different.

But let's make it clear, the fundamental problem is that Canada has mostly wrong reasons to get closer to Europe. Canada can keep looking for a dialogue but at the end of the day Europe knows that Canada has never really developed a true "European" policy.... except to save it from the stranglehold of the United States.

For a much detailed analysis, see the article"Le Canada et l'Union européenne: du dialogue économique au partenariat renforcé?" by Christian Deblock on the CEIM website.

Christian Deblock is the director of the CEIM (Centre d'etudes sur l'integration et la mondialisation). He is an economist and a professor of political science at the University of Quebec in Montreal.

Michèle Rioux is a professor of Political Science at the University of Quebec in Montreal. She is a specialist in political economics and is currently researching international organizations and global governance.

  • 10
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | EU | Canada | trade | transatlantic relations |
 
Comments
Donald  Stadler

June 10, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
What form might a 'true "European" policy' take for Canada?
 
Lukas  Vitalijus

June 11, 2008

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

Relationship between Canada and the EU should not be narrowed down to pure economics. While it is true that Canadian businesses have been looking for the ways to diversify trade (especially, after 9/11 terror attacks on North American soil when the longest unguarded border has been shut and later on when United States has learned about terrorist cells inside Canada) it is unlikely that Europe going to match the US or China.

That said, the potential for re-newed cooperation could be find in other areas. Consider Europe's role in peace-making or its strive to become the first post-modern entity settling a wide range of issues in diplomatic rather than coercive manner based on force. Canada does not need to balance United States (as some voices in Europe proclaim) but working closer with Europe it could help to solve a great deal of world problems like famine, environmental degradation and maybe even humanitarian crisis like the ones happening in Congo or Sudan. That would benefit Europe, it would benefit Canada and finally it would contribute in making not only Western part but also the rest of the world a safer, cleaner and a more prosperous place to live.
 
Ilyas M. Mohsin

June 11, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
A strange logic appears to guide the authors of the article. Even if Canada has no 'European" policy, as alleged, it is entitled as a free to
promote her interest. If in the process it breaks the US' 'stranglehold', so much the better for her.
Any friendly overtures should not promote paranoia despite the fact that North American and European systems are different. Inter-state relations are meant to co-relate interests as well as the modes of business etc between different countries and so be it in the case of Canada.
 
Donald  Stadler

June 11, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"but working closer with Europe it could help to solve a great deal of world problems like famine, environmental degradation and maybe even humanitarian crisis"

Why not? It's hard to be against something like that and I'm sure that only nuts would try.
 
Unregistered User

June 12, 2008

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

Let us be clear. Canada is an important exporter, looking outward for market and investment opportunities. Canada also needs the United States, and in spite of its critics, NAFTA is a real economic success. Since NAFTA, our bilateral trade has grown spectacularly, surplus is immense and our relation with the United States receives high priority, now more than ever. Yet, at the same time, we have put all our eggs in one basket and neglected our friendly relations with many other countries, especially with EU. Until now, it was not a real problem, but as competition increases and as our trade surplus is based more and more on natural resources, especially gas and petroleum, we need to reconsider our trade policy as well as our economic policies. We did not suggest a turning back from United States; we only said that Canada was suffering from both a Dutch disease and myopia and that the country urgently needs to build new partnerships and renew its relations with the EU. Be sure, it’s not paranoia; it’s only lucidity.

What is a “true European policy”? First of all, as Lukas Vitalijus said, we need to renew and develop our cooperation relations in areas other than trade. UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions is a good example of how fruitful this cooperation can be. We can find many other examples like this one, but we surely have to create new opportunities and think beyond trade relations. Secondly, we must give more priority to cultural, scientific, regulatory and academic cooperation activities - and sustain (and finance) them actively. This is especially true in the case of Canada. For instance, European students are increasingly coming to Canada, but is Canada sufficiently inciting students to go to Europe? Why do our students no longer go to Europe? Third, Canada needs a sustained, ambitious and aggressive European policy, not a sketchy and sporadic one, or even less a falling back position when things are going wrong. Transatlantic dialogue is formidable instrument to develop cooperation, but we need to nurture it and avoid limiting our vision and strategy to trade issues and commercial interests. If this remains true, trade and investment are, nowadays, key elements of integration processes. To realign cooperation on other issues would require political will and a strategic vision that seem to be inexistent at the present time – at least in Canada.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?