Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

September 7, 2007 |  7 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

For Transatlantic Future, Look Beyond Heads of State

Casey S Butterfield: The German foreign minister’s recent visit to California illustrates an important trend: the Atlantic Community as we know it is expanding. Today’s global challenges call for more cooperation between cities, states, civil societies, and citizens.

When German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier journeyed to the US last month to talk transatlantic cooperation, he skipped the White House completely. His destination? Sacramento, California—and some face-time with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Many in Germany have reacted with amusement to their foreign minister’s sit-down with the Governator, but the meeting was on topics of international importance: the two talked of cooperating on policies to combat global warming, and Steinmeier invited Schwarzenegger to the October EU climate conference in Lisbon. More serious is the realization that it was the first time in fifty years that a German foreign minister has visited the West Coast of the United States.

California’s economy is one of the ten largest in the world, with a gross state product higher than Spain or Canada’s GNP. Speaking in San Francisco after conferring with the governor, Steinmeier stressed that EU states are the “biggest investors and trading partners” in California. So why don’t he and other diplomats drop by Sacramento more often?

They certainly should. In this new globalized world, states like California have an important role to play in international relations. Individual states’ policies are often conspicuously divergent from those of the executive and legislative branches of the United States federal government. California, for example, has had more restrictive automobile emissions standards than the rest of the US—and Europe—since it was first given special dispensation in the 1990 amendment to the US Clean Air Act for its excessive smog. Those same tighter standards have been adopted by fourteen other US states, including heavyweights New York and Florida.

In the past, this pioneering spirit in California and others has usually led only to copycat policies across state lines, as recently as 2006. But now we are facing unprecedented global challenges, combined with advances in communication technology and a decline in violent conflicts across the planet. International heads of state, particularly Europeans, have the ability and the motives to engage a much broader range of representatives than in the past. Civil society organizations and regional authorities are influencing world politics as never before—witness the non-governmental efforts at Gleneagles and Heiligendamm that helped put development and environmental concerns on the G8 agenda. When it comes to issues like climate change and energy security, we are all stakeholders, and Steinmeier’s recent visit to Sacramento shows that European leaders are willing to look beyond a nation’s capital city for solutions.

Their citizens should also follow this example. Too often in Berlin, Brussels, Paris and London, the US is reduced to two places: Washington for the politics, and New York for finance and culture. California is eight hours behind Greenwich Mean Time; New York is five. Choosing to visit Los Angeles instead of Washington DC will add six hours onto your transatlantic trip. Is it geographic distance that gives Europeans this selective amnesia when it comes to the existence of other US states?

Perhaps we need a new name for this reinvigorated relationship between Europe and North America, one that includes state governments and heads of state alike. Or it could be that we must simply broaden our conception of this continuum between Europe and North America, this Atlantic Community. The Atlantic Ocean is a bridge between two continents, and the connection between the two has grown to encompass a bigger portion of those regions since 1989. Let’s make it even bigger.

It’s not just the Cold War paradigm that’s over; it’s the notion that borders and established, respectable governments take precedent over federal states, civil society organizations and new EU members. The Enlightenment-era ideals that hold Europe and America together exist in other places besides those that we have too long considered as the traditional West—and it shouldn’t take fifty years to find them.


Casey Butterfield is the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic Community. Ms. Butterfield studied comparative literature at the University of California, Berkeley, and holds a master’s degree in international relations from the University of Cambridge. She is a former Fulbright scholar and has worked as an editor, writer and translator in Spain, Great Britain and the United States. She grew up in Los Angeles.


Related Materials from the Atlantic Community:

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Oliver  Hauss

September 7, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
One could also see it in this fashion: George W. Bush is increasingly seen as a lame duck president whose recalcitrant opposition on issues such as climate change is of less and less importance while he is being overtaken by the rest of his country. So he is sidelined and talks are being held with people where actually some productivity is seen as achievable.

In any case, I don't quite see why Europeans supposedly have "selective amnesia" concerning the existence of California. Hollywood and Silicon Valley are certainly of international importance and perceived as such, and San Francisco still seen as a "place to be". In fact, during my time studying in the US, I found the time to visit the West Coast, but all I saw of the East Coast was looking down from a plane...
 
Casey S Butterfield

September 7, 2007

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Oliver, I think George Bush's waning star is a partial explanation for what's going on right now, but from where I sit the phenomenon looks much bigger--any attempt to sideline George Bush would still not explain the increased political activity of NGOs like DATA and Transparency international in tandem with increased connections between US federal states and European nations.

As for your second point, I've lived in Europe for most of the last six years and still encounter surprise that a native Californian like me could have such interest in transatlantic relations. Perhaps it comes down to the proximity to the Pacific and Asia, but this should not preclude connections across the Atlantic.

You are right that Hollywood resonates in the extreme with Europeans as the engine of US cultural diplomacy, and Silicon Valley is a household name for different reasons. Yet I stand by my point that California as an environmental innovator with the level of of influence of a nation-state is still a very new concept, and one that you will see much more of as Schwarzenegger tries to solidify his gubernatorial legacy by reaching out to other nations because of White House stonewalling on climate change.
 
Annie  Glimmerglass

September 8, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
It seems to me that we often hear about US policy-makers meeting with heads of states in the EU, in various places in Europe. I've never considered the fact that EU policy-makers don't meet too often with heads of "states" in the US, especially the western states. I'm intrigued with this idea, and agree with Ms. Butterfield that the
idea has merit, not only because we have a president who continues to
defy and deny the forward thinking of the rest of his country, but
also because the states of the US, as she points out, are taking it
upon themselves to remedy such issues as global warming, despite what
the federal government is doing.
Incidentally, every day I get emails regarding City Councils in
states around the US, voting to begin impeachment proceedings of Bush
and Cheney. The United "States", beginning with cities, may end up
being extremely important in determining what happens here in America, and how that affects the rest of the world.
 
Joerg  Wolf

September 9, 2007

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
@ Ms Glimmerglass

Yes, and indeed even leaders of Congress meet with heads of state in Europe. Nancy Pelosi, who is of course also from California, discussed climate change with Chancellor Merkel in May:
"Climate change is a global problem that requires unity and "multilateral" agreements if it is to be defeated, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Tuesday. (...)
Pelosi is in Germany as part of a European tour to highlight congressional concern about climate change."

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2960306420070529?pageNu...

Some Republicans expressed disagreement, because they believe all aspects of foreign policy should be left to the federal government....
Tags: | Merkel | Pelosi | climate change |
 
Andrew  Losowsky

September 10, 2007

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I completely agree that federal states (in those countries that have them) have a far greater effect on people's lives than the federal government in most everyday issues.

Unfortunately, I have a suspicion that traditional politics makes it harder for foreign ministers to gain much more from meeting federal leaders than some good PR with the local business communities that may help exports, and sharing experiences that may later shape policy.

Unfortunately, every deal in international politics is connected, from environmental issues to the positioning of army bases; a compromise in one area helps a deal in another. Such is international diplomacy, and so the level of negotiation/complication that a national government can offer will always be of more importance than a federal one. There is much to be gained from focusing on the more local; but however much it may be desirable, heads of state in the medium term will continue to hold the reins.
 
Casey S Butterfield

September 10, 2007

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Well said, Andrew. All that you say is certainly true, but I am not quite so pessimistic: if you follow some of the links in my article, you will see, for example, that Jos Dings, Director of The European Federation for Transport and the Environment , notes with regret that new European standards are still below those of "California and ten other American states". If a US federal state can cause a European talking head, part of that intricate network of "international politics", to lament that Europe is losing its edge, it shows that we're heading toward an era in which who holds the reins may be the wrong question.

What we may actually be seeing is a trend toward multilateralism and an expansion of who the stakeholders are on soft issues, and traditional executive-led external policy on the hard stuff. Here your last paragraph is spot-on.
 
Unregistered User

April 27, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
To the
Voter from our
United States of Amerika

Betr.: Shame of you!!!

Guten Tag,
sehr geehrte Damen und sehr geehrte Herren,
sprich ehrenwerte Waehler/Innen.

Durch das Fernsehen musste ich miterleben, wie Frau Hillary Clinton
in Richtung meines Kandidaten folgendes schrie. Shame of you!!!

Umderentwillen ist meinerseits folgende Lebensweisheit kundzutun:

Wer im Glashaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen werfen.

Mit anderen Worten:

Keinesfalls mein Kandidat,
wohl aber / wohl aber der Ehemann von Frau Hillary Clinton,
sprich Mr. Bill Clinton war in seiner Amtszeit abgerutscht
zu einer Hure der Verdorbenheit / zu einer Hure der Verkommenheit,
bishin zum Luegner.
Bin ich im Irrtum?

Nie und nimmer mein Kandidat,
wohl aber / wohl aber das Ehepaar Clinton
haben seinerzeit
in aller Deutlichkeit / in aller Klarheit / in aller Oeffentlichkeit
unser Whitehouse
beschmutzt, besudelt und entehrt.
Bin ich im Irrtum?

Wie auch immer, fuer mich ist folgendes gueltig.

I am with Obama….I am with Obama….I am with Obama….I am with Obama

It is time for a new generation of leadership in our United States of Amerika.

Lasset uns weltweit,
mithin auch in unserer Geschaefts-Welt
ins Zentrum rueckend
das Denken ~ der Gedanken den Menschen.

Frieden sei in und mit Ihnen,
ehrenwerte Damen – ehrenwerte Herren,

Moege unser Gottvater uns beschuetzen,
vor der Gier nach Erfolg – vor der Gier nach Money, Money, Money,
sprich vor den Tanz um das Goldene Kalb.

Von Herz zu Herz,
wuensche ich uns Glueckauf,
insbesondere aber allzeit Frieden,

Gern verbleibe ich
mit freundlichem Gruss

Wilfried Kupsch
Sto. Niño Road 24, Brgy. Lingsat,
2500 San Fernando City , La Union ,
P H I L I P P I N N E S

Referenzen:
http://www.baerchen.biz
http://mitglied.lycos.de/philippines/index.htm
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Iris  Abraham
Iris Abraham
Member since
July 12, 2007

Poll

Should the EU take Guantanamo detainees as requested by the Obama administration?


DW-WORLD.DE


Europe
Europe
Business




DW-TV Live DW-Radio Live