Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

August 7, 2009 |  7 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Topic Is the EU Suffering From 'Visa Liberalization Fatigue'?

Rudi Guraziu: The EU seems to have made its political decision as far as visa liberalization for the West Balkans is concerned. However, by excluding the two nations who have suffered the most during the conflict it risks stability in the region.

On 15 June 2009 the EU Council concluded that the ‘Council encourages the European Commission to present, as soon as possible, a legislative proposal amending Regulation 539/2001, as it applies to the Member States, in order to achieve a visa free regime ideally by the end of 2009 with those countries that will have met all the benchmarks.'

For months, EU officials have repeatedly stated that Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia appear to have fulfilled all the criteria set out on their roadmap towards visa liberalization, i.e the introduction of biometric passports, modernisation of their border crossing points, readmission agreement, establishment of closer cooperation with Europol and strengthening the fight against corruption and organised crime. The EU has invested so much in the defence of both Kosovo and Bosnia & Herzegovina; but why have they shot themselves in the foot by excluding these countries together with Albania from full implementation of visa liberalization?

Leaving aside the problem of the five EU countries regarding the Kosovo independence, this EU decision is such an obviously flawed and discriminatory policy towards the Albanians in Kosovo and Albania as well as the Bosnian Muslim population in Bosnia & Herzegovina that it could put at risk stability in both Kosovo and Bosnia. This could have broader, negative repercussions in an ethnically volatile country such as Bosnia. There may be some who will look for a sinister subtext to this seemingly ‘technical' issue.

This openly discriminatory policy against these two nations could potentially backfire on the EU. Regrettably, the EU is doing nothing but reaffirming that its memory is too short. It has learned nothing from its consecutive mistakes during the 1990s.

It is striking that the EU seems to have accepted that Serbs from Kosovo will have no problem in obtaining Serbian passports both because they are eligible for dual citizenship and because they can easily record their residence as somewhere in the territory of Serbia. The same would apply in the case of both Croat and Serb communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The EU's argument can be further undermined since it is likely that as early as July 2010 Bosnia and particularly Albania (which recently was praised for holding free and fair elections according to European standards) could join the Schengen White List.

Now, it is important to be clear about what could potentially happen in Kosovo and Bosnia as a consequence of the EU making another mess of its foreign affairs. In the short term the visa liberalization issue could potentially play into the hands of radicals in Kosovo - further disheartening the young population there - and more so in Bosnia where the Muslim population could view this as European Islamophobia. In the long term, however, the EU's openly discriminatory policy vis-à-vis Kosovo could have a number of rather positive consequences. First, the EU, by confronting Serbia with a fait accompli, as far as Kosovo's independence is concerned, may convince the majority of the population in Serbia and its political elite that Kosovo is gone for good. This could further weaken Serbia's already shaky argument regarding the legality of Kosovo's independence before the International Court of Justice. Secondly, by making it clear that the visa liberalization will not apply to the residents of Kosovo the EU will put off some Kosovars from obtaining Serbian passports.

Unfortunately, for the Kosovar Albanians themselves (who have been unjustifiably discriminated for decades through no fault of their own) this flawed EU visa liberalization policy will come with a huge price tag as far as their freedom of movement is concerned. They will be denied this basic right - hopefully not for long - while their neighbours in the Balkans will be able to enjoy unrestricted movement within the Schengen Zone, a way to faster EU integration.

The article is an extract from a paper entitled ‘European Union Foreign Policy Vis-à-Vis the Western Balkans: An Ongoing Puzzle' , presented at the 6th EuPRA bi-annual Congress, 23-25 July 2009, TIRANA - BRIDGING DIVIDES: EUROPEAN PEACE ARCHITECTURE OF INTEGRATION AND ENGAGEMENT.

Previous Balkan Week articles on Atlantic Community:

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | Balkans | Kosovo | Serbia | Albania | Bosnia | EU | Visa liberalisation |
 
Comments
Pawel Jan Olszewski

August 7, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Rudi Guraziu

Your opinion is very interesting and stresses few very important matters.

Best wishes

Paweł Olszewski
 
Member deleted

August 10, 2009

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Instead of connecting people of western Balkans with western Europe the EC proposal will divide again people according their nationality or location. From EU's side the reason for division is seen technical related to common standards; from western Balkan's perspective the reasons for division can be seen political or even related to religion.

In Bosnia-Herzegovina the EU's message now weakens already non-existent national identity and opposes EU's earlier multi-ethnic ideals. In Kosovo some NGOs send a letter to EU where they state that Kosovo`s exclusion from the visa-liberalisation process threatens to transform Kosovo "into a ghetto without any way out”.

EU and international community have guided and supervised these regions towards “European standards”. So has EU failed with this task as those countries without outside supervision are getting visa-freedom earlier?
 
Joshua  Posaner

August 12, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thanks for your article Mr Guraziu., so are you suggesting that the EU should liberalize visa requirements across the area? To avoid such claims of discrimination must the EU act with a blanket policy?

Thank you for your comments Mr Rusila, I'm interested in how we can measure success for the EU in the region? Are its actions now completely undermining the progress made?
 
Member deleted

August 12, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
To mr. Posaner,

please find my view EU's Kosovo success story from my comment to Mrs. Pond article below.

I realy think that the progress is going backwards there. The core problem from my point of view is, that EU applied one-sided approach to Balkans mid 90s where Serbs were the evil and the other ethnic groups the good ones. One part of the problem was that fabricated reports and other propakanda went through western mainstream media during Bosnian and Kosovo wars (as well later with Iraq and Georgia cases).

A follow-up aspect is that both Washington and Brussels are implementing their fixed agenda both BiH and Kosovo - an agenda where is no real local commitment.

To find fast exit strategy western powers hastily recognized Kosovo unilateral declaration of independence against UNSC resolution 1244 without real negotiations between local stakeholders which did not made any base for sustainable development. This could however be possible by pushing reset button e.g. by nullification recognization and starting real talks at local level without determined outcome. In Bosnia-Herzegovina Prud agreement might be a good start.

More about topic one may find from my BalkanBlog articles, address - http://arirusila.wordpress.com
 
Unregistered User

August 13, 2009

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Mr. Guraziu,
I certainly agree with your point. The Commission proposal has already been criticized by bosnian muslims and may create a further devide in the population. But there is another problem with the suggested visa-liberalisations. All the countries left out in this round are muslim (or part muslim) countries. This could send an unfortunate signial to the muslim (and the rest of the) world, that EU is a club of christians...

As far as I know do Bosnia-Hercegovina already recently implementet the demands (issued the first biometric pasports) for joining the vlsaliberalisations - so I don't see why BiH should not join already in this round?

Best,

Kristoffer
 
Unregistered User

September 24, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Joshua & Kristoffer, Sorry i couldn't respond sooner - holidays :-)

Thanks for your comments. I believe an EU ‘blanket policy’ is necessary to deal with the Western Balkans - otherwise the EU risks creating new division lines in the region, (pleasing Samuel Huntington) hence further obstructing regional cooperation (one of the main EU conditions toward integrating the Western Balkans within its structures).

The issue of visa liberalisation is purely political. Of course its important for the Balkans to fulfill all the criteria but the technical aspects the EU is highlighting are nothing but an excuse to avoid further embarrassments within the Union particularly since sharp divisions still prevail among EU Members regarding many issues (visa liberalisation being an example).

Kristoffer you are right about Bosnia; Albania too has introduced biometric passports. For more on EU foreign policy vis-a-vis the Western Balkans see link http://www.ypfp.org/content/european-union-foreign-policy-vis-%C3%A...

Yours,
Rudi


 
Rudi  Guraziu

September 24, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Joshua & Kristoffer, Sorry i couldn't respond sooner - holidays :-)

Thanks for your comments. I believe an EU ‘blanket policy’ is necessary to deal with the Western Balkans - otherwise the EU risks creating new division lines in the region, (pleasing Samuel Huntington) hence further obstructing regional cooperation (one of the main EU conditions toward integrating the Western Balkans within its structures).

The issue of visa liberalisation is purely political. Of course its important for the Balkans to fulfill all the criteria but the technical aspects the EU is highlighting are nothing but an excuse to avoid further embarrassments within the Union particularly since sharp divisions still prevail among EU Members regarding many issues (visa liberalisation being an example).

Kristoffer you are right about Bosnia; Albania too has introduced biometric passports. For more on EU foreign policy vis-a-vis the Western Balkans see link http://www.ypfp.org/content/european-union-foreign-policy-vis-%C3%A...

Yours,
Rudi
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Isabelle  von Roth
Isabelle von Roth
Member since
April 20, 2007

Poll