Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

June 20, 2007 |  6 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Ana Gomes

Portugal Plans Africa Focus During EU Presidency

Ana Gomes: I detail the Portuguese agenda for EU external relations over the next six months. While the Constitution will be an obvious priority, the flagship event for the presidency will be the EU-Africa Summit in December 2007. Portugal wants to strengthen the transatlantic alliance and organize the inaugural EU summit with Brazil. Renewed emphasis on the Euromed process and European Neighbourhood Policy is also planned.

The EU Constitution question will be Lisbon’s main priority during its presidency, should the June European Council produce a clear mandate for Portugal to open a new Intergovernmental Conference. Nevertheless, Portugal will have plenty of opportunities to demonstrate its political and diplomatic skills when it comes to leading the EU in the world.

External relations have a much stronger element of unpredictability than other areas, and the EU will face deteriorating situations beyond its control in Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and Somalia. These conflicts may come to overshadow any pre-set priorities for the Union in the second half of 2007. Lisbon will also inherit the need to negotiate a new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Russia. As relations between the EU and Moscow seem to have hit rock-bottom, success in this area is unlikely. A tense showdown in the UN about the future status of Kosovo might further deepen the rift between Russia and the EU, while potentially splitting the EU itself, should Kosovo decide to unilaterally declare independence.

Portugal wants to shift the attention of the EU southward, giving a new impetus to the Euromed process and strengthening the southern dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy. The Portuguese presidency will also organize the first-ever summit between the EU and Brazil, in addition to the important summits between the EU and partners such as Russia, China, India and Ukraine.

The United States needs Europe more than ever. Lisbon has set itself the ambitious goal of revisiting and strengthening the transatlantic alliance at a time when the current US administration is reaping the whirlwind - domestically and abroad - for its many mistakes, and Congress has awakened from its long slumber. But the EU, under the Portuguese presidency and beyond, will have a hard time getting the attention of a White House immersed in domestic affairs.

The flagship event of Portugal’s presidency will be the EU-Africa Summit in Lisbon in December, which should deepen the relationship between the European and African Unions. Expectations are high. Portugal wants this meeting to produce a joint EU-Africa Strategy about such common challenges as terrorism, migration, climate change, poverty and conflict resolution. The length and political sophistication of the outcome document, however, will not be an accurate measure of the EU’s willingness to help solve Africa’s problems. Neither will the smiles on the leaders’ faces during the traditional photo-ops. Only serious EU progress on the ground in countries like Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, the DRC and Zimbabwe can demonstrate that Europe, led by Portugal in the next six months, is willing and able to assume its responsibilities in Africa. This will have to include progress on poverty reduction and reaching the Millennium Development Goals.

Portugal is approaching most of the major foreign policy challenges the EU will face in the next six months without a strong national agenda. This is one of the virtues of EU presidencies by small and medium countries. Portugal will try to make the most of it.



Related Materials from the Atlantic Community:

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Raffaello  Pantucci

June 20, 2007

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
This highlights the very real problem of having these rotating presidencies. Now that we have shifted to a Southern European country, the very immediate issue of Russia will be dropped completely from the agenda since it is not a priority issue for them. Fair enough, we all have national priorities and naturally Portugal's interests are to Latin America and neighbouring Africa, but at the same time, how is the world ever going to take the EU seriously if every six months there is going to be another overhaul in policy priorities.
 
Valentina  Klausen

June 20, 2007

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I can only agree with Raffaello! I too see it as a problem that the presidency is rotating. But as the recent behavior by Poland clearly demonstrates , is that it is a dire necessity to get the project of an European "constitution" under way. It strikes me as odd, why a small county, which was not only just allowed entry into the EU, and has profited widely from it, through subsidies, easier labor movement and the such, can effectively stall the negotiations. Once again a typical "European" problem becomes obvious: much talk, not too much action. If Poland (sorry if I keep talking about Poland, but I think some sort of an agreement in regards to a common line, would address, if not solve the problem Raffaello pointed towards) keeps on interfering with the process Chancellor Merkel initiated, maybe it has to be thought of action against Warsaw.
 
Joerg  Wolf

June 20, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Raffaello,

There are some efforts to deal with the problem you mentioned:

The German EU Presidency has declared:
(http://www.eu2007.de/en/The_Council_Presidency/Priorities_Programmes)

"For the first time an 18-month programme for the three successive German, Portuguese and Slovenian Presidencies was elaborated for the period January 2007 to June 2008. It is the Council's official work programme for that period and was drawn up in close coordination with the Commission. The General Affairs and External Relations Council adopted the 18-month programme during its meeting on 11 December 2006"

And "(external)18-month Programme of the German, Portuguese and Slovenian Presidencies":http://www.eu2007.de/includes/Download_Dokumente/Trio-Programm/trioenglish.pdf

Sufficient coordination?
Tags: | rotation | EU presidency |
 
Raffaello  Pantucci

June 21, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Joerg,

You are right about the strategy paper (that i had read and have been shouting about in meetings as a great sign that the EU is actually moving towards some sort of coordination) and i had put a great deal of hope in that myself as well, however, the reality is that the Portugese simply do not have the capacity within their MFA to deal with issues like Russia or other Eastern issues. By which I mean they do not really have the expertise in-house. I know people who are working on the Central Asia issue that the German presidency has been so great about, who simply cannot find a Portugese expert on the region to talk to. It turns out that the Portugese might end up running their entire element of this strategy from their Moscow Embassy - a pretty appalling signal to send to a former Soviet region that we are trying to engage with.

Now, i may be proven wrong and i hope so, as i am a big Europeanist and hope dearly that the Germans are able to keep the Slovenes and the Portugese driving an agenda that they have started. But, at the same time, as Ms. Gomes highlights in her piece they want to shift the entire agenda southwards, where their natural interests lie. Great, but this means that any progress that Europe may have been generating towards establishing some semblance of a consensus and line towards Russia will dissapate. She as much says this is the case. So where does this leave the truly critical issue of EU-Russia relations? Yes, Africa and Euro-med and Latin America are important - but Russia is too - in fact, i would argue that if Europe is not even able to achieve its foreign policy objectives with its biggest neighbour and main energy supplier - then what on earth does it think it will be able to achieve anywhere else? What credibility will it have with the Africans or anyone else when they know full well that six months later the focus will shift.

I will stop, as i fear i am starting to rant. I dearly hope that the Germans have some plan in place to bolster the Portugese and the Slovenes so that we are able to see some consistency, and until we see what happens i will remain optimistic. But, if the policy is going to be as Ms. Gomes writes above - then i see the EU's foreign policy credibility simply slipping further. Something that would be a real shame after Ms. Merkel's excellent work on the Eastern issues and her push to try to coordinate between the three Presidencies. So Joerg: here's hoping.

On the others: Valentina: what you are saying sounds dangerously like Jacques Chirac's arrogant line that the new member states should "know their place." I personally think that while the Poles are being rather cantankerous, they are members and have a seat at the table and so we have to keep their needs and fears in mind. If they are acting irrationally - then we have to help them work through their issues. They are in, we cannot throw them out, and so let's find out what's wrong and make it better. This lot may be rather Euro-sceptic, but they are not irrational.
 
Raffaello  Pantucci

June 21, 2007

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I should probably ammend something i wrote here slightly. There is a chance that the Poles may not be quite as rational as one thought: Jaroslaw Kaczynski, Poland’s prime minister, said a proposed new EU voting formula based on population size hurt his country because it had not recovered from its losses following the German invasion of September 1939.

“We are only demanding one thing, that we get back what was taken from us,” Mr Kaczynski said in an interview with Polish national radio. “If Poland had not had to live through the years of 1939-45, Poland would be today looking at the demographics of a country of 66m.”
 
Valentina  Klausen

June 21, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Raffaello,

I didn't want to sound like the former French president. However, I do believe the current situation highlights an EU- habitual problem: the "unum" approach. While in theory it'd be great if we could all just get along and be friends, but there is always something at stake some interests that have to be taken into account and so forth. I would cautiously advise the leaders at the EU Commission to not give in to any threats, and not to give veto-power to any(!) of the members. This would not be any solution, a 2/3-majority is already an obstacle, not easy to be overcome.

Let's all hope for the best, and pray that the Kaczynski-twins get down to reality.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Anna  Przybyll
Anna Przybyll
"A wise old owl lived in an oak The more he..."

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?