When President Obama told the nation his revised policy on Afghanistan, he indicated that America's mission in that country is not open-ended in duration, that we will leave when our objectives have been accomplished, and that those objectives are worth the sacrifices. Obama's primary goal is the destruction of the Taliban insurgency against the corrupt Karzai government.  

The president should have addressed the problem of corruption within the government of President Hamid Karzai and explained why the CIA had his brother on its payroll. Did the CIA foster the widespread Afghan corruption that we are now criticizing? The same brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, is widely believed to be involved in the highly profitable drug trade. When this was called to the attention of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, she said, "Every country makes compromises, and it behooves you to be humble about pointing fingers." This was hardly a denial, and it fits neatly with her comfort with the Karzai regime despite evidence of widespread fraud in the recent presidential election.

Another front requires a presidential explanation. The Obama administration prides itself on transparency in government operations but it hasn't told us about the US Army providing security that will enable China to exploit in Afghanistan one of the world's largest deposits of copper, earn tens of billions of dollars, and feed its insatiable appetite for valuable raw materials.

This US troop deployment protects the Chinese investment - the largest in Afghanistan's history - from the Taliban and the impoverished locals.  It saves the Chinese from having to send their own troops abroad to defend their economic interests.  We seem to have no problem doing just that - even keeping our troops there under fire - for a decade.  Remarkably, we are doing this favor for the Chinese despite the fact that a qualified American corporation bid but lost the contract.  When Chinese President Hu Jintao recently had dinner with President Obama, did they discuss the quid pro quo for this astonishing cooperation? Should we know the deal? Does it have any connection with the continuing purchase of US government bonds by China in spite of the decline in the value of the dollar?

Beijing faces enormous challenges in completing the project and gaining access to the estimated 240,000,000 tons of copper accessible through surface mining alone.  Taliban-led insurgents are likely to harass the Chinese project for nationalistic reasons to preserve this valuable Afghan asset from the foreigners. It is estimated that this project development will take decades.  Is this another indication that U.S. forces will remain in Afghanistan indefinitely? Was Obama's promise to leave Afghanistan merely a traditional Chicago-style razzle dazzle act put together by his closest political advisers, David Axlerod and Rahm Emanuel to deflect criticism with hocus pocus?

Jerome Grossman is the author of 'Relentless Liberal' and the retired president of the Massachussets Envelope Company. He is a former member of the Democratic National Committee and the Chairman Emeritus of Council for a Livable World. Please click here to visit his website.

Related Material from Atlantic Community:

• May Hu: A new Reality for the United States
• Dario Cristiani: The Dragon's Increasing Thirst for Oil
• Marco Vicenzino: Upgrading Support for Afghanistan