5 comments |  Print this Article | E-Mail Best Of Think Tanks  

African Union Needs a Permanent Seat at the G-20

Tom Cargill | Chatham House | July 2010

Africa should no longer be regarded through the narrow lens of humanitarian aid. For the sake of economic interests, the developed world's public would do well to discard these images that have long outlived their usefulness. Africa is growing in strategic importance, and it is high time that the West adapts its idea of Africa to the new reality on the ground. If the United States and Europe fail to quickly gather their bearings in this new world, they risk forfeiting their position in Africa to emerging powers from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. As one means of preventing this, the African Union should be granted a permanent seat at the G-20. Africa must finally be taken seriously as a strategic economic partner.

Africa represents a mosaic of vastly different cultures and countries at diverging stages of economic development. The potential for highly advantageous investments in these countries is enormous for private firms originating in the transatlantic community, based on cultural affinity and established business ties. However, not least because of a demonstrated lack of Western interest in Africa's economies, this advantage is about to be lost. In the wake of the financial crisis, projects and joint ventures in Africa are being cut by the dozen, while academic research lacks funding. By contrast, countries such as China, Turkey, South Korea, and Brazil have all aggressively stepped up their activities on the continent. After all, 40 percent of the world's reserves in raw materials are to be found on the continent, as well as huge amounts of fresh water and fossil fuel sources. Nevertheless, the West continues to view the engagement of other countries in Africa - China in particular - in terms of a zero-sum game. What the continent does not need in the 21st century is a new scramble for Africa. In spite of the financial crisis, aid for Africa and investment opportunities on the continent today should be seen for what they are: profitable enterprises and not handouts.

The G-20 today is the most effective forum for coordinating the activities of the states interested in Africa. Enormous efforts not only from beyond but also from within the continent will be necessary in order to realize its full potential for the sake of Africa's inhabitants and the global community. Investments will only return a profit in places where the rule of law and political stability protect them against the arbitrary use of power. With an eye to the ponderous and corrupt bureaucracies ruling many African countries, much remains to be done within Africa itself. Future aid to Africa should be made contingent upon greater involvement of the private sector. It alone is capable of producing sustainable growth. Internally, African states must consistently implement democratic reforms, as well as more assertively pursue their common interests in their external relations.

This summary was prepared by the Atlantic Community editorial team from "Our Common Strategic Interests: Africa's Role in the Post G-8 World" published here by Chatham House.

 

 
 

 
Tags: | reforms | aid | Africa |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

Sat, Jul 24th 2010, 10:56

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
How will this help them? They are all made up of corrupt selfish tyrants holding tightly to power rather than think of their citizens' deplorable conditions. They should first finish with constitutional reform.
Paul Biya, a superman French stooge can never have a single construction sentence to make apart from dancing Essamba Essamba. He wins elections before organizing them.
 
jacqueline  gorham

Tue, Sep 14th 2010, 15:12

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I agree that investment and development needs to occur on the African continent, and that a certain level of stability will be an essential precondition to any investment or meaningful developmental assistance- whether the source is a foreign government or corporation. Until the desired level of stability is reached, the only entities willing to invest in Africa will be those wanting to exploit it. Perhaps giving Africa a seat at the G-20 will assit it in elevating its position to level where it can attract the kind of investment it needs.

With regard to China's investment in Africa, there has been little evidence to show that China's involvement in Africa is furthering development. Unfortunately, the complete lack of transparency of China's projects prohibits a comprehensive analysis of whether there have been positive impacts from the country's investment. In Zambia, for example, where Chinese investment has significantly increased in the last decade, the statistical data reflects the country has experienced growth in some areas of development during the last eight years: GDP, life expectancy, and primary school enrollment. But has made no progress or has regressed in other areas: literacy, infant mortality and rates of employment. Additionally, the data and studies corroborate Zambians' complaints that the Chinese are not hiring locals (unemployment has risen according to the available data) and that conditions at Chinese owned companies have been found to be violative of international labor laws and local safety standards. In my opinion, to define China's involvement in Africa as an "investment" is premature.

 
Unregistered User

Tue, Sep 14th 2010, 23:25

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Giving the African Union a seat in the G20 will just serve to further the inaccurate assumption that there is a singular pan-African nation. Beyond the blurring of unique cultures and histories this generalization can lead to a "one size fits all" approach to African development. Well-meaning donors may propose pan-African solutions that actually do more harm than good in certain nations. Specificity is needed when tackling on the ground development problems and creating a sense of an African Union in a large economic forum will not help to give each country what it needs to grow.
 
Meital  Tzobotaro

Sat, Oct 30th 2010, 02:45

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I agree with the previous commentator, Erica, that Africa is indeed a continent that is it too often lumped together, even though as mentioned in the article, it is one of the most diversified areas of the world. Giving a union a permeant seat in a forum that is membered by countries sends the wrong message. It signifies on the one hand the importance of inclusion, but on the other, that the inclusion is not important enough to grant individual countries seats, so they were all put together. Why, in that case, should we not just give one unified seat to the European Union? After all, the EU is much more operational and integrated than the AU.
I agree that African counties should be represented more, and that is will be beneficial to include the AU, but possibly on a consultative basis.
 
Ximena  Benavente

Thu, Nov 11th 2010, 20:07

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
first of all the g-20 includes industrial and emerging markets. I don't think there is any country in Africa that has achieved that state yet.

I do agree with the author's point that aid has no purpose in Africa. Aid has been provided for years and infrastructure as well as democracy remain very fragile. The author touched upon the need for investment and this can only come with the endowment of natural resources. Africa needs a more intensified industrialization process along with a more developed private sector. Most of the African capital is not invested in Africa, but in markets that provide profit. Also, African youth has no motivation to stay and develop their own nations. So the first thing to resolve is immigration. How can African countries motivate their population to stop their local brain-drain?

Before considering the African Union, I would emphasize each country individually and see its own status. Also there are many other countries that are more capable of being part of the this forum and are more developed than Africa.

Although the intentions are good, Africa still has to overcome several barriers, including corruption and lack of institutionalism.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?