Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

November 11, 2008 |  3 comments |  Print | E-Mail Atlantic Memos  

Memo 9

Topic Afghan Police and Economy: Lynchpins for Success

Memo 9: Afghanistan needs a continued international commitment to ensure its security and assist in economic and social development. The US, EU and Germany must focus on training local authorities. Cooperating with Iran and the Taliban remains a point of debate.

Atlantic-community.org has launched its project "Focus Afghanistan," which aims to develop policy recommendations on how to proceed in Afghanistan. Here are the Atlantic Community members' first proposals: A majority agrees that the international community should remain involved in Afghanistan but urges key contributing countries to revise their strategies. Members could not agree on NATO's future in Afghanistan, the role of Iran, or negotiations with the Taliban:

1. No withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The international community cannot afford to withdraw from Afghanistan at the present time. Although Lucke emphasizes that any foreign-troop presence incites insurgency, most argue that a quick withdrawal would detrimentally destabilize both Afghanistan and the region. Leaving Afghanistan could recreate the repercussions of the Soviet troop withdrawal - "another civil war and the rise of international terrorism" (Daiyar).

2. EU, US and Germany must strengthen Afghan police and economy.

  • EU: Since EU member states are hesitant to contribute militarily to the mission, the EU should find other areas in which to increase its efforts. More police trainers are needed for EUPOL; the EU should pledge an additional 500 officers and civilian experts for police training (Smith). In addition, more civilian experts need to be sent to implement economic development programs through agri-businesses and micro-finance distribution (Rusila).
  • US: Any American surge should focus on training local police. Afghan National Police forces (ANP) are more than just police, they are "paramilitary forces fighting an insurgency" (Broschk). Successfully training the ANP would require around 2,200 foreign officers and experts, a long-term security effort more important than a simple troop surge (Sheeran).
  • Germany: As a leading European nation, Germany must rethink its strategies both domestically and within Afghanistan. Three issues are vital: Advancing domestic dialogue concerning Afghanistan must be spearheaded by Parliament through public hearings resulting in benchmarks and targets for the extended troop deployment (Benner / Zimmermann). Also, the government needs to eliminate national caveats (Rashid). And the Bundeswehr must refocus on human intelligence gathering and cultural and language training for police mentors in Afghanistan (Broschk).

3. NATO needs international support.
NATO’s role in Afghanistan remains disputed. Lucke echoes popular concern: NATO is divided and thus ineffective. However, Eversteijn still considers the NATO alliance essential for progress and calls on members to make good on promised contributions. More global participation could allow NATO to scale down its Afghanistan commitments (Swierczynski).

4. Iran cannot be ignored.
While most members agree that regional actors must cooperate to solve Afghanistan's problems, there is little consensus on how to make Iran a positive factor in the region. Some believe that Iran can assist in Afghanistan, especially in combating drug production and sales (Parsa). But community members are divided on how to make Iran cooperate: Rashid suggests immediate dialogue with Iran, and Stadler argues that the financial crisis and the falling oil price could bring Iran to the negotiating table. Others suggest strong sanctions, like an embargo on gasoline imports (Hadjisky).

5. Consider negotiations with the Taliban.
Opinion on negotiations with the Taliban is divided. Some members argue that negotiating is a form of surrender. Furthermore, Daiyar argues that negotiations should only take place under certain pre-conditions: the insurgents must lay down their arms and join the democratic process. Broschk disagrees: "having your opponent lay down their arms is what you want to achieve in negotiations, not a pre-condition." Eventually negotiating and sharing government power with "ex-Taliban" and Pashtun leaders is probable (Stadler).

Atlantic Memos showcase the best ideas and arguments from debates in the Open Think Tank on www.atlantic-community.org. The recommendations expressed above come from your Atlantic Community - please take the next step and help us spread the word. You can download a PDF copy of this Atlantic Memo to distribute to your local or national decision-makers.

Written by David Neil Lebhar

 
  • 7
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | ANP | ANA | troop surge | Pakistan | Iran | Afghanistan | Atlantic memo | police | army | economy | development | drugs | poppy | taliban | Pashtun | EUPOL | NATO | ISAF | EU | US | Germany |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

November 19, 2008

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I wonder if the Alexander the Great and the Romans who invaded and subdued much of Europe (Germany excepted) had these discussions as to how to proceed both civilly and militarily against folks who were not of their persuasion(s). In the end they colonized them, including much of England up to Hadrian's wall. I do not think we have made a persuasive case for using the military in this fashion.

Can anyone explain the presence in Bagram of Russian military aircraft, including huge lift capacity helicopters? What is our strategic posture in the former Soviet "Republics"? Why is it necessary?

More and more it is looking like the defeat of Al Quaida is an UN, intelligence and international police action in cooperation with various countries.
Tags: | strategy |
 
Unregistered User

November 19, 2008

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I wonder if the Alexander the Great and the Romans who invaded and subdued much of Europe (Germany excepted) had these discussions as to how to proceed both civilly and militarily against folks who were not of their persuasion(s). In the end they colonized them, including much of England up to Hadrian's wall. I do not think we have made a persuasive case for using the military in this fashion.

Can anyone explain the presence in Bagram of Russian military aircraft, including huge lift capacity helicopters? What is our strategic posture in the former Soviet "Republics"? Why is it necessary?

More and more it is looking like the defeat of Al Quaida is an UN, intelligence and international police action in cooperation with various countries.
Tags: | strategy |
 
Unregistered User

July 10, 2010

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The problem is, as realities become more apparent, it also becomes increasingly difficult to match words with inputs and action. Returning to the drawing table is not a bad option!
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Sudakshina  Chattopadhyay
Sudakshina Chattopadhyay
Member since
March 14, 2011

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?