Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

September 1, 2009 |  3 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Marek  Swierczynski

Poland's Policy Setbacks Should Steer it Back Towards the EU

Marek Swierczynski: As the US signals a reluctance to build the missile defense project, tensions with Russia develop and the deployment of troops in Afghanistan loses public support, Poland’s international standing continues to fall. With Jerzy Buzek at the helm of the EU Parliament and the upcoming presidency going to Poland, Warsaw must now turn to Europe ahead of its Atlantic focus.

Poland's moderate center-right government of Civic Platform has suffered a series of setbacks in its international policy recently. The major security project of the missile defense base and the subsequent opportunity to establish a strategic partnership with the US, inherited from the atlanticist orientated Law and Justice Party, is now under serious review in Washington. Media reports suggest that the shield will never come to Poland as Obama’s team attempts to be careful in its relations with Moscow and becomes less convinced about the reliability of the technology. Commentators who were previously enthusiastic about the election of Obama just a few months ago are now describing Poland-US relations as being at their lowest point since 1989. This comes as a great disappointment to many observers but has been predicted for some time by cool-headed skeptics.

Further souring Atlantic relations is the all too difficult deployment of Polish troops in Afghanistan. Stretched over their capacity and suffering from a lack of strategic airlift or attack helicopters the Polish contingent is taking the toll of a war that wasn’t meant to be. This grave situation has already forced the resignation of the land forces commander after he publicly criticized the Ministry of Defense for its slow deployment of reinforcements and failure to properly supply the troops. During this time the public feeling is that those troops have paid the price in blood. The realities of the ISAF mission have once again shocked the public as it has emerged that the 10th Polish victim, a platoon commander in the rank of captain, bled to death whilst waiting for close air support (CAS) and search and rescue (SAR) helicopters. The Defense Minister has survived so far but the damage done to the perception of Poland’s major foreign policy deployment is beyond repair.

As if this was not enough, the long awaited improvement in relations with Russia has failed to become a reality. On the eve of a rare visit from Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who will take part in the 70th anniversary of World War II, Russian state media have aired a series of films depicting Poland as Hitler’s ally who secretly fought again Soviet Russia alongside the Third Reich. Although Warsaw reacted calmly the climate for reconciliation has now been spoiled. However, Poland’s efforts to build a coalition of countries who defy Russian energy dominance in Europe has brought modest results Just days ago Warsaw’s energy independence goals suffered a blow when the issue of the Lithuanian power plant Ignalia failed to be taken seriously internationally. In addition to this a 20 year billion dollar energy deal with Qatar has been marred by the failure of ill designed negotiations with investors to buy the Polish shipyards.

It is becoming increasingly clear that Poland took the wrong path by trying to strengthen its international position by acting single handedly in the transatlantic field outside of the EU framework on energy policy. A remnant of the radical government of Jarosław Kaczyński, largely upheld by Donald Tusk, has proved costly and inefficient. With less than two year left until Poland’s turn as the EU’s Presidency it is time to focus once again on the European agenda and pursue international policy goals through EU channels, not diverting around or against them. Poland’s greatest success in the international scene so far has been the naming of Jerzy Buzek as the President of the European Parliament with the support of the largest political group in the European Parliament and the largest EU country in Germany. This should be a clear signal to re-direct Poland’s foreign policy before it ends up in chaos.

Marek Swierczynski is a journalist with a special interest in defense and security matters and a member of the Polish Euro-Atlantic Society.

 Related material from the Atlantic Community:

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | EU | Poland |
 
Comments
Carmelo  Molina

September 16, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Witam!

First at all, thanks a lot for your article!

I'm sure you probably know better than me the recent affaire with General Waldemar Skrzypczak. I'm afraid that the extrapolations for others countries like Spain or Germany are really obviously.

In Poland, in my opinion, one of the big problems concerns the fact, that we find there two official bodies who are fighting at this moment, and at their "duty" levels, against themselves, I mind: MON (the Ministry of Defence) and BBN (Biuro Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego, in english: the National Security Bureau). Each Polish citizen knows who commands the MON and who rules the BBN, and how it is a reduced example of the national political fight between PO and PiS (sic!).

Concerning ISAF and polish troops, the question, of course, is how Afghanistan could affect the electoral results of the incoming presidential election in Poland?

If Germany and other EU countries (ie. Spain, France or Italy) withdraw from Afghanistan in the next years (by the way, what a incredible debate we have in Germany on this subject!), I'm rather sure that Poland will remain in Afghanistan if the US ask for it, no matter who will be the next US Presidente: Obama II, Mrs. Clinton or my beloved Sarah Palin.

Lacze wyrazy szacunku (bez polskich znaków),

http://carmelomolina.wordpress.com/

Ps.- I miss "Radek" Sikorski in your article...
 
Unregistered User

October 20, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I'm in complete agreement with Mr Swierczynski. The previous foreign policy activities were ill-conceived, essentially Russophobic, and backward-looking. There still appears to be very little movement in establishing a rational foreign policy which is not confrontational, but which is cool-headed and which addresses the future of Poland, rather than reactive kneejerks whenever a real or imagined crisis occurs. Hopefully also the chimaera of some kind of special, magical relationship with the US is being set aside, and in its place a realistic assessment made of the strategic value of membership of the EU.

The lamentable failure of Poland's foreign policy towards Russia to date has been the inability to understand that there is NO difference between the strategic interests of the wider EU and of Poland itself. The comparison in some quarters of the discussions between chancellor Merkel and prime minister Putin as some sort of Ribbentrop-Molotov re-enactment was childish and plainly embarrassing. In straightforward terms, the only issues which we should have with Russia are:

(1) Sympathetic and friendly encouragement of a civil society
(2) Striving towards stable energy politics/supply parameters, and
(3) Mutually beneficial trade relationships.

Nothing, but NOTHING else matters. History can take care of itself, and is best left to academics - when it is mixed with politics and myth it can become a toxic brew which can blight a generation.

A touch of modesty would not come amiss. Although the days of Vladislaus IV when the Republic could affect the Ottoman Empire, the Grand Duchy of Muscovy and the Holy Roman Empire are long gone, for the first time in three centuries Polish society is not under an immediate threat, has the breathing space to plan for a future, and has the economic resources to do so effectively. One can only hope that the leaders we choose are up to the task.
 
Jeremy   Wysakowski-Walters

January 20, 2010

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Marek,

Your article touches on some important points. However, there are a few issues where popular media and public opinion have perhaps misleading impressions. Firstly you talk of a lack of strategic lift capability. While you are of course right, there are very few countries with such an ability. NATO and WEU countries have developed a pooling strategy to cover this shortfall. Therefore Poland is by no means the only country with a lack of strategic lift.

Secondly, you mention the shock of the public over Afghanistan and the price in blood. Relative to its size Poland has suffered low casualties in comparison to the USA or the UK (UK has had approx 10 times the fatalities). Although of course any death is abhorrent, I do not agree that the “perception of Poland’s major foreign policy deployment is beyond repair.”

Finally, Jerzy Buzek's appointment, although perhaps historic, has little value on the world stage. Poland's future and foreign policy are not linked with the position of EU Parliamentary President and therefore this has little bearing on strategic decisions.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Sudakshina  Chattopadhyay
Sudakshina Chattopadhyay
Member since
March 14, 2011

Poll

Should NATO intervene in Syria?